Also known as: marital communications privilege · marital confidential communication privilege · spousal privilege · husband-wife privilege · marital privilege
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A privilege that shields confidential communications exchanged between spouses during their marriage from compelled disclosure in judicial proceedings. The law presumes such exchanges are confidential, placing the burden on the party seeking disclosure to rebut that presumption.
Marco Marquez and Meredith Maxwell discussed his emissions data tampering while alone on their back deck one evening. The government later subpoenaed Meredith to recount the exchange at trial. The court refused to compel her testimony because the setting supported the presumption of confidentiality and the government offered no rebuttal evidence.
Daniel Ortiz and Maria Ortiz discussed altering hospital billing records at their kitchen table with no one else present. When the government called Maria to testify about those statements, Daniel invoked the privilege. The court excluded the content of the private exchange while allowing Maria to testify about non-communicative observations.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Molly and Ross argued in their bedroom about suspicious packages on trucking routes. Ross was willing to describe his road observations but reluctant to repeat Molly's incriminating bedroom statements. The court permitted testimony on the observations but barred disclosure of the confidential marital exchange.
Joan and Eleanor discussed staging fake accidents while lying in bed each evening. Eleanor later volunteered to testify about the scheme. Joan successfully asserted the privilege to block questions about the bedroom conversations even though Eleanor was willing to speak.
Owen and Caleb discussed burning unsold crops during private talks in their farmhouse office. The government subpoenaed Caleb to testify about those conversations. Owen invoked the privilege and the court sustained the objection because the exchanges occurred in confidence with no third parties present.
Either spouse may assert the privilege to prevent disclosure of confidential marital communications. The privilege is distinct from the adverse spousal testimonial privilege, which belongs only to the witness spouse in federal criminal cases.
Supporting sources
Yes. The privilege applies to any confidential exchange between spouses regardless of the topic. Statements concerning criminal conduct remain protected if made in confidence during the marriage.
Supporting sources
The government must overcome the presumption that spousal communications are confidential. The spouse asserting the privilege need not affirmatively prove confidentiality.
Supporting sources
No. Public sharing of identical content does not rebut the presumption or destroy the privilege for separate private marital communications made at other times.
Supporting sources
The communications privilege protects only the content of confidential statements made during marriage. The testimonial privilege concerns whether one spouse may be compelled to testify at all and belongs solely to the witness spouse in federal criminal cases.
Supporting sources
…in custody, as evidence that the stabbing was not in self-defense. The wife did not testify at trial because of the State’s marital privilege. Petitioner argued that admitting the statement would violate his Sixth Amendment right to be confronted with the witnesses against him. The trial court agreed to admit the statement, and…