Also known as: lesser included offense doctrine · lesser-included offense doctrine · lesser included offense · LIO doctrine
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A principle in criminal procedure that treats one offense as included in another when all of its elements form a subset of the greater offense's elements. The doctrine bars entry of convictions on both offenses arising from the same conduct and treats an acquittal or conviction on the lesser as an acquittal of the greater. It also prevents successive prosecution for the greater offense after jeopardy has attached on the lesser and for the lesser after jeopardy has attached on the greater.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Lillian Locke was tried on a single count of insurance fraud after submitting one false claim package. The jury convicted her only of the lesser offense of using false documents and returned no verdict on the greater fraud count. After the trial court later vacated the lesser conviction because of an erroneous accomplice instruction, the state attempted to retry Locke on the original fraud charge arising from the identical submission.
Latoya Lane pleaded guilty in municipal court to illegal dumping after leaving barrels at a vacant lot. Months later the state indicted her for felony hazardous-waste disposal based on the same barrels and the same act. The felony charge required proof of every element needed for the misdemeanor plus the additional element that the material was hazardous.
Lily Lopez stood trial on a felony odometer-fraud charge. The jury acquitted her of the felony but convicted her of the lesser deceptive-advertising offense based on the same mileage alterations. After the lesser conviction was vacated for instructional error, the state refiled the original felony count.
Liam Larson was convicted in state court of the lesser offense of falsifying patient records after altering billing entries. State prosecutors later attempted to charge him with the greater offense of insurance fraud arising from the identical billing scheme. The fraud charge required proof of every element needed for the falsification offense plus additional elements.
Luke Latham used force against a security guard while retaining stolen merchandise. The prosecutor charged both robbery and the lesser misdemeanor of property destruction arising from the single episode. The misdemeanor offense contained no element outside the robbery.
Luis Lopez stood trial on a felony charge of mail fraud. The jury acquitted him of the felony but convicted him of the lesser state falsification offense based on the same scheme. After the lesser conviction was vacated for instructional error, the state attempted to retry Lopez on the original felony count.
A defendant may not be convicted of both when every element of one offense is contained within the other. The prosecution may charge and try both offenses, but the court may enter judgment on only one.
Supporting sources
No. A finding of guilty on the lesser included offense constitutes an acquittal of the greater inclusive offense even if the lesser conviction is later set aside.
…but declined to instruct on manslaughter. He submitted the robbery case to the jury on both an armed-robbery theory and on the lesser included offense of robbery by intimidation. The jury found the petitioner guilty of two counts of armed robbery and two counts of murder. At the penalty stage, which took place before the same jury,…
…petty theft from grand theft. See, e. g., S. D. Codified Laws § 22-30A-17 (Supp. 1982). Few would dispute that a lesser included offense should not be punished more severely than the greater
…According to his own testimony, Hayes had pleaded guilty in 1961, when he was 17 years old, to a charge of detaining a female, a lesser included offense of rape, and as a result had served five years in the state reformatory. In 1970 he had been convicted of robbery and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment, but had been released on…
…in the absence of express statutory authority, their general power to modify erroneous judgments authorizes reduction to a lesser included offense
…(b). If Congress intended subsection (b) to set forth substantive crimes, in respect to which subsection (a) would define a lesser included offense
Supporting sources
The absence of a verdict on the greater offense operates as an implicit acquittal that bars retrial on the greater charge even after the lesser conviction is vacated.
Supporting sources
Yes. The insufficiency determination constitutes an acquittal of the greater offense that remains effective even though the lesser conviction is later vacated for unrelated reasons.
Supporting sources
No. Conviction of the lesser bars subsequent prosecution for the greater when the greater requires no proof beyond that needed for the lesser plus additional elements.
Supporting sources