Also known as: malice in law · implied malice · constructive malice
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Malice inferred from a person's conduct rather than directly expressed. It arises when the actor intends to inflict great bodily injury, acts with reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life, or intends to commit a felony.
Liam Larson speeds his truck through a busy festival crowd after an argument. He swerves directly at bystanders without braking. The jury finds legal malice from his conduct even though he never stated an intent to kill.
Leah Lamb breaks into a home intending to steal electronics. When the homeowner confronts her, she pushes the victim down the stairs during the escape. The death during the felony supplies legal malice for a murder charge.
Luke Latham locks a coworker in an office and strikes him repeatedly in the head with a heavy stapler until unconscious. The victim later dies from brain trauma. The sustained attack on a vulnerable area supports a finding of legal malice through intent to cause great bodily injury.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
After a heated dispute, Dan stabs Vic multiple times in the chest. Vic dies at the scene. The repeated targeting of vital areas allows the jury to infer legal malice from conduct showing intent to inflict great bodily injury.
Rob robs a convenience store at gunpoint. When the clerk resists, Rob fires once into the clerk's torso and flees. The shooting death during the felony supplies legal malice under the felony-murder rule.
A defendant claims sudden rage negated any culpable mental state after a fatal stabbing. The prosecution must prove the killing occurred with legal malice. The court places the burden on the state to establish that element beyond a reasonable doubt.
Legal malice is inferred from conduct such as intent to cause great bodily injury or reckless indifference to life. Express malice requires a direct, conscious intent to kill. Both satisfy the malice aforethought element of common law murder.
Supporting sources
Yes. Intent to inflict great bodily injury, reckless indifference to human life, or intent to commit a felony each supplies implied or legal malice. Any one of these mental states satisfies the malice aforethought requirement for common law murder.
Supporting sources
Intentional use of a deadly weapon in a manner likely to cause death or serious injury permits a jury to infer intent to kill. That inference helps establish express malice, which in turn satisfies the requirement of legal malice for murder.
Supporting sources
No. Legal malice exists when the defendant intends an unlawful killing without justification or mitigation. It need not involve personal hatred and can be formed instantly before the act.
Supporting sources
…either express or implied." Manslaughter was a killing "in the heat of passion, on sudden provocation, without express or implied malice aforethought." Id. , at 686, and n. 3. Although "express malice" at one point may have had its own significant independent meaning, see Perkins, A Re-Examination of Malice Aforethought, 43…