Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A procedural mechanism that permits multiple parties or claims to be combined in a single action.
Sources & Authorities· 16 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Restatements
Casebooks
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Class Action Numerosity Challenge
Jonathan Jaffe and 450 other investors each lost modest sums when Jaffe Securities concealed material risks in its public filings. Rather than filing hundreds of separate suits, Jaffe brought a single action on behalf of the entire group. The court found that the sheer number of potential plaintiffs made individual joinder impossible and certified the class under the governing rule.
Supplemental Claim Against New Party
Jacqueline Juarez sued a state agency in federal court under a federal civil-rights statute. After discovery revealed that a private contractor had participated in the same events, Juarez added a state-law tort claim against the contractor. Because the new claim arose from the identical facts as the original federal claim, the court exercised supplemental jurisdiction over it.
Spousal Consent to Property Transfer
Joanna Jung and her husband owned a vacation home. Before his death the husband transferred the property to their adult son. Jung later signed a written statement confirming she had no claim to the transferred parcel. The probate court treated the transfer as part of a unified estate proceeding because the written joinder satisfied the statutory requirement.
Issue-Specific Choice of Law
Jada Jones, a State A resident, purchased land in State B from a State A seller. When a third party later claimed an easement, the court applied State B law to the property interest but used State A procedural rules to decide whether additional parties could be joined. The selective application followed the issue-by-issue approach to joinder questions.
Interpleader of Competing Claimants
Jessica Jacobs held insurance proceeds that both Jasmine Jordan and Jacobs Shipping claimed after a cargo loss. Fearing double liability, Jacobs filed an interpleader action naming both claimants as defendants. The court permitted the joinder even though the claimants asserted independent and adverse theories.
Venue for Nonresident Defendant
Jenkins Apparel, a foreign corporation with no U.S. residence, was sued together with a domestic supplier in a products-liability action. The plaintiff filed in a district where the supplier resided. Because the foreign defendant could be sued in any district, its joinder did not affect the venue calculation for the remaining parties.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
6
When does a class action satisfy the numerosity requirement for joinder?+
A class satisfies the requirement when the number of members makes joining every individual impracticable. Courts examine the size of the proposed class together with factors such as geographic dispersion and the modest size of individual claims.
Supporting sources
Does supplemental jurisdiction extend to claims involving additional parties?+
Yes. When a district court has original jurisdiction, section 1367(a) grants supplemental jurisdiction over related claims that form part of the same constitutional case or controversy, expressly including claims that involve the joinder or intervention of additional parties.
How does a surviving spouse's written consent affect inclusion of transferred property in an augmented estate?+
Property transferred with the surviving spouse's written joinder or with the spouse's written consent given before or after the transfer is excluded from the decedent's nonprobate transfers to others. The written consent need not appear on the deed itself.
Supporting sources
May a court apply different states' laws to joinder questions and to substantive property issues in the same case?+
Yes. Choice-of-law analysis proceeds issue by issue. Courts traditionally apply forum procedural rules, including those governing joinder of parties, while selecting the law of another state for substantive questions such as the validity of a land transfer.
Supporting sources
When is interpleader joinder proper even if the claimants' theories are adverse and independent?+
Interpleader is available whenever the plaintiff faces exposure to double or multiple liability. The rule expressly permits joinder regardless of whether the claimants' titles share a common origin or whether their claims are adverse and independent.
Supporting sources
How does the presence of a nonresident defendant affect venue analysis?+
A defendant who does not reside in the United States may be sued in any judicial district. The joinder of that defendant is disregarded when determining proper venue with respect to the remaining defendants.
Supporting sources
under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, adopted subsequent to the decision in Frothingham . Whatever the merits of the current debate over Frothingham , its very existence suggests…
Civil ProcedureAppealability and review · Final judgment ruleUBEIntermediate