Also known as:implied reciprocal servitudes · implied reciprocal negative servitude
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A servitude created by implication when a developer conveys land subject to restrictions that implement a general plan of development. The implication burdens the developer's remaining land within the plan when necessary to avoid injustice to purchasers who relied on the scheme.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Developer Retains Interior Pad
Ivy Investments subdivided a tract into restaurant pads and sold the first two to Iain Irons using deeds that required outdoor seating along a central plaza and prohibited drive-through lanes. Marketing materials promoted a cohesive pedestrian dining district. Ivy Investments later contracted to sell an internal pad to Isla Ireland for a double drive-through with no plaza seating. Iain Irons sued to block the drive-through. The court implied a reciprocal servitude burdening the retained pad because the uniform restrictions implemented the general plan and injustice would result if the developer could exempt its remaining land.
Uniform Luxury Subdivision
Aurora Communities marketed a gated subdivision as a uniform luxury community and sold the first fifty lots to Igor Ito using deeds that required stone façades and prohibited visible rooftop solar panels. Marketing materials showed stone homes throughout the project. Aurora Communities later contracted to sell an interior tract to Imran Iyer without any restrictions. Igor Ito sued to enforce the design limits. The court implied a reciprocal servitude on the remaining tract because the uniform restrictions and marketing established a general plan and early purchasers relied on the scheme.
Put it into practice
Test Yourself
10
Practice Questions5
· 8 sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Restatements
Hornbooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
Dictionaries
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What facts establish a general plan sufficient to imply reciprocal servitudes?+
A recorded plat or master plan, uniform restrictions in early deeds, and consistent marketing materials that promote a unified character for the entire development together establish a general plan. Courts examine these circumstances to determine whether the developer intended all lots within the project to share the same burdens and benefits.
Supporting sources
When will a court refuse to imply a reciprocal servitude even though a general plan exists?+
A court will refuse implication when the facts or circumstances indicate a contrary intent, such as a later deed that deliberately omits restrictions or evidence that the developer abandoned the original scheme for remaining land. The rule requires that implication be necessary to avoid injustice.
Supporting sources
Does the doctrine protect only early purchasers or also later buyers within the plan?+
The doctrine protects early purchasers who relied on the general plan by implying reciprocal burdens on the developer's remaining land. Later buyers within the plan take subject to those implied servitudes when the plan and reliance interests support implication.
Supporting sources
Can marketing materials alone support implication of reciprocal servitudes?+
Marketing materials that uniformly describe a unified development contribute to proof of a general plan, but courts also require evidence such as recorded plans or consistent restrictions in early deeds before implying reciprocal servitudes on remaining land.
Supporting sources
Real PropertyRights in real property · Restrictive covenantsUBEFoundational