Also known as:hostilities · hostile · acts of hostility
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
3 senses
1
in evidence law
A witness whose interests align with an opposing party or who shows antagonism toward the examining party. This status permits leading questions on direct examination to develop testimony.
2
Sense 1
1
in evidence law
A witness whose interests align with an opposing party or who shows antagonism toward the examining party. This status permits leading questions on direct examination to develop testimony.
Sources & Authorities· 1 primary source
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Federal Rules
Examples
Sense 2
2
in property law
Possession of land that is without permission and asserted against the true owner's rights. Hostility is an essential element of adverse possession that must continue for the statutory period.
Sources & Authorities· 1 primary source
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Examples
Sense 3
3
in tort law
Personal animosity or ill will that motivates an act. Liability for assault, false imprisonment, and related torts does not require the actor to have been inspired by personal hostility.
Sources & Authorities· 2 sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Possession of land that is without permission and asserted against the true owner's rights. Hostility is an essential element of adverse possession that must continue for the statutory period.
3
in tort law
Personal animosity or ill will that motivates an act. Liability for assault, false imprisonment, and related torts does not require the actor to have been inspired by personal hostility.
Each sense below has its own examples, sources, and questions.
2
Former Manager Examined on Direct
Liberty called Tabitha, Apex's former property manager, on direct examination. Tabitha had overseen the apartment complex during the period of alleged concealment and later joined Liberty. The court permitted leading questions because Tabitha remained identified with the adverse party Apex at the time of the events.
Declaration Creates State of Enmity
Congress declared war on a foreign nation. The declaration placed the two countries in a state of hostility, triggering rights and disabilities under the law of war even though no personal animosity existed between individual citizens.
Frequently Asked1
When may a party use leading questions on direct examination of its own witness?+
A party may use leading questions on direct when the witness is hostile, is an adverse party, or is identified with an adverse party. The rule prevents an opposing side from shielding unfavorable testimony through its own aligned witness.
Supporting sources
1
Truck Path Used Without Permission
Benjamin's startup installed cable and drove maintenance trucks across the data center's gravel path weekly from 2005 onward. No permission was ever granted. The use continued openly after ownership changes, satisfying the hostility element for a prescriptive easement claim.
Frequently Asked1
What does hostility require in an adverse possession claim?+
Hostility requires that the possessor occupy the land without permission and in opposition to the true owner's rights. Good-faith mistaken belief that the land is one's own satisfies the element and permits tacking of successive periods.
Supporting sources
Examples3
Confinement Without Personal Animosity
A store security guard locked a suspected shoplifter in an office to await police. The guard acted solely to prevent loss and felt no personal ill will toward the individual. Liability for false imprisonment still attached because the confinement was intentional.
Threat Made Without Ill Will
During a heated negotiation, one party raised a fist and threatened to strike the other if a deal was not accepted. The threat was made to close the transaction, not from personal hatred. The actor remained liable for assault.
Force Used in Self-Defense
A homeowner struck an intruder with a bat to stop an advancing attack. The homeowner felt no personal hostility and acted only to protect family members. The privilege of self-defense applied regardless of the absence of animosity.
Frequently Asked1
Must a defendant act from personal ill will to be liable for assault or false imprisonment?+
No. Liability arises from the intentional act itself. The absence of personal hostility or desire to offend does not defeat a claim when the elements of assault or confinement are otherwise met.
Supporting sources
494 U.S. 872, 110 S. Ct. 1595, 108 L. Ed. 2d 876 (1990)Constitutional Law
…enacted precisely to protect the rights of those whose religious practices are not shared by the majority and may be viewed with hostility. The history of our free exercise doctrine amply demonstrates the harsh impact majoritarian rule has had on unpopular or emerging religious groups such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses and the…