Also known as:harmless error · harmless-error principle · harmless error rule · harmless error doctrine
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A rule that excuses a defect in will execution formalities when the proponent establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the decedent adopted the document as his or her will.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Notary Date Error in Signed Will
Henry Hoffman met with his controller to review a typed draft will. He read it, signed it, and had it notarized, but the notary mistakenly dated the acknowledgment one week earlier and no second witness signed. After Henry died, his second wife offered the document for probate. His son objected based on the execution defects. The court admitted the will because clear and convincing evidence showed Henry adopted the document as his will.
Harmless Error in Waiver Ruling
Harriet Hamilton offered her late husband's will for probate. One required witness had failed to sign in the testator's presence. The son objected on execution grounds. The court admitted the will because clear and convincing evidence showed the decedent adopted the document as his will.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Restatements
Casebooks
In re Estate of Gagnier26 Cal.Rptr.2d 128 (App.1993)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
What evidentiary standard must the proponent meet under the harmless error principle for wills?+
The proponent must establish by clear and convincing evidence that the decedent adopted the document as his or her will. This standard replaces strict compliance with formalities when the evidence shows the decedent's intent.
Does a missing witness signature automatically invalidate a will in a harmless error jurisdiction?+
No. A missing witness signature is an execution defect that may be excused if clear and convincing evidence shows the decedent intended the document as the will. The court focuses on adoption of the writing rather than perfect compliance.
How does the harmless error principle differ from strict compliance in will execution?+
Strict compliance invalidates any will that fails a statutory formality. The harmless error principle allows probate when the proponent proves by clear and convincing evidence that the decedent adopted the document despite the defect.
826 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 2002)Family Law
…under section 2-503 of the Uniform Probate Code,[^maj-3] which by way of a dispensing power allows a probate court to excuse a harmless error in complying with the formal requirements for executing a valid will, it is doubtful that an unsigned will would be given any effect. See Unif. Probate Code § 2-503 cmt. (amended 1997), 8…
Trusts and Estates Decedents EstatesWills · Execution requirementsUBEFoundational