Also known as: fixed-point residency requirements · fixed-date residency requirements · fixed point residency requirement · fixed date residency requirements · durational residency requirements
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A form of state benefit eligibility rule that conditions access on having resided in the state at a specified past point in time or on a fixed historical date. Such rules distinguish between current residents based on their status at an earlier moment rather than on the length of their current stay.
Frank Fisher moved from State X to State Y and applied for cash assistance. The agency denied the application because Frank had not lived in State Y on the fixed date of January 1 of the prior year. Frank sued claiming the fixed-date rule penalized his recent interstate move.
Floyd Franklin relocated to Iowa and sought a divorce after six months. The court rejected the petition because Floyd had not resided in Iowa at the fixed point of his high school graduation. Floyd challenged the fixed-point rule as burdening his right to settle in the state.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Francesca Fiore, a lawful permanent resident, applied for Medicare after moving to Florida. Officials denied coverage because she had not lived in the United States on the fixed date specified in the eligibility statute. Francesca sued alleging the fixed-date condition violated equal protection.
Freya Freeman moved to California and applied for welfare benefits. The state calculated her grant using the lower benefit level of her prior state because she had not resided in California on the fixed date of her arrival. Freya challenged the fixed-date rule as penalizing her interstate travel.
Fatima Flores, a resident alien, sought state welfare after settling in Arizona. The agency denied benefits because she had not lived in Arizona at the fixed point of her birth. Fatima sued claiming the fixed-point rule unconstitutionally burdened new residents.
Flora Ford moved to Mobile and sought to register to vote. Officials rejected the application because she had not resided in the city on the fixed date used to draw the electoral districts. Flora sued alleging the fixed-date rule diluted her voting rights.
Fixed-point or fixed-date rules condition eligibility on residence at one specific past moment or date rather than on the length of continuous stay after arrival. Durational rules impose a waiting period measured from the date of the move. Both forms can trigger equal protection challenges when they penalize new residents.
Supporting sources
Litigants typically invoke the Equal Protection Clause and the constitutional right to travel. Courts apply strict scrutiny when the rule burdens interstate migration by denying benefits to otherwise eligible new residents.
Supporting sources
No. Protecting the treasury by discouraging entry of persons who might need benefits is not a constitutionally permissible objective. Courts have rejected this rationale under strict scrutiny analysis.
…did not seek to intervene or to file an amicus brief. Reasoning that PRWORA permitted, but did not require, States to impose durational residency requirements, Judge Levi concluded that the existence of the federal statute did not affect the legal analysis in his prior opinion in Green . He did, however, make certain additional comments on the…