Also known as:federal venue transfer statutes · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · § 1404 · venue transfer statute
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A federal statute that permits a district court to transfer a civil action to another district or division for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. The transferee district must be one where the action might have been brought or one to which all parties have consented. When the transfer occurs from a district where venue was proper, the transferee court applies the same state law, including the same choice-of-law rules, that the transferor court would have applied.
Sources & Authorities· 3 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Hornbooks
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Transfer After Proper Venue Choice
Francesca Fiore filed a products liability suit in federal court in State X against Franklin Foundry, where venue was proper because the company maintained a major facility there. After discovery revealed that most witnesses and evidence were in State Y, Fiore moved under the statute to transfer the case to federal court in State Y for convenience. The State Y court must apply the same state substantive law and choice-of-law rules that the State X court would have applied.
Convenience Transfer With Forum Selection
Fusion Power sued Fidelity Trust in federal court in State A over a contract dispute. The contract contained a clause selecting State B as the forum. Fidelity Trust moved to transfer under the statute. The court granted the motion because the clause receives controlling weight and the public-interest factors did not overwhelmingly disfavor transfer.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What law does the transferee court apply after a § 1404(a) transfer from a proper venue?+
The transferee court must apply the same state law, including the same choice-of-law rules, that the transferor court would have applied. This rule holds even when the plaintiff requested the transfer after initially choosing an inconvenient forum. The transfer functions only as a change of courtroom and does not alter substantive rights.
Supporting sources
Does a forum selection clause affect analysis of a § 1404(a) transfer motion?+
A valid forum selection clause receives controlling weight in the § 1404(a) analysis. Courts ordinarily enforce the clause by granting transfer unless exceptional public-interest factors overwhelmingly disfavor it. Private-interest factors are largely disregarded once the parties have agreed on a forum.
Supporting sources
Can a court lacking personal jurisdiction transfer a case under § 1404(a)?+
Authority in the Third Circuit permits transfer under § 1404(a) even when the transferor court lacks personal jurisdiction over the defendant. The power to transfer for convenience is not defeated by that jurisdictional defect.
Why does the Ferens rule prevent plaintiffs from obtaining more favorable law through transfer?+
The rule blocks plaintiffs from filing in an inconvenient but law-favorable forum and then seeking transfer to obtain both convenience and better substantive rules. It preserves the original forum's choice-of-law framework to maintain predictability and prevent manipulation of the transfer statute.
Supporting sources
Civil ProcedureJurisdiction and venue · Venue, forum non conveniens, and transferUBEFoundational