Also known as: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 · FRCP 8 · Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) · Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(b) · Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(c) · Rule 8
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A federal procedural rule prescribing the required content of pleadings in civil actions in federal court. The rule demands a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief and requires factual allegations that state a plausible claim rather than a merely possible one.
Frank Fisher sued Falcon Dynamics alleging that the company had discriminated against him in promotion decisions. His complaint stated only that the company acted with discriminatory intent and that he was treated differently from similarly situated employees. The court disregarded the bare legal conclusion and found no well-pleaded facts showing a plausible claim of discrimination.
Felix Franco sued Fisher Foods and Fusion Power alleging they conspired to fix prices. The complaint asserted that both companies raised prices at the same time and used similar pricing formulas. The court held that these facts were consistent with independent business decisions and did not make an agreement plausible.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Francisco Frost filed a malpractice action against his former lawyer. The complaint alleged that the lawyer had failed to report another attorney's misappropriation of client funds despite learning of it during representation. The court examined whether the factual allegations about the lawyer's knowledge and inaction stated a plausible claim under applicable professional conduct standards.
Finn Fletcher sued Franklin Foundry alleging securities fraud after a sudden drop in stock price. The complaint detailed internal reports showing executives knew of production defects months before disclosure. The court assessed whether those specific factual allegations created a strong inference of scienter sufficient to survive dismissal.
Frederick Ferguson sued Francesca Fowler for damages arising from an alleged assault. The complaint referenced a prior criminal acquittal on the same facts and asserted that the acquittal barred relitigation of identity. The court evaluated whether the pleaded facts regarding the prior proceeding satisfied Rule 8 while testing the preclusion defense.
Fusion Power sued Franklin Foundry for breach of a supply contract. The complaint stated that the parties entered a multi-year agreement and that the defendant failed to deliver conforming goods after notice of defects. The court held that these allegations gave fair notice of the claim under the governing pleading standard.
A complaint must include enough factual matter to state a claim that is plausible on its face. Courts disregard conclusory allegations and determine whether the remaining well-pleaded facts permit a reasonable inference of liability.
Supporting sources
The standard now requires plausibility grounded in factual allegations rather than mere notice of a conceivable claim. Facts that are merely consistent with liability are insufficient.
Supporting sources
No. Absent a specific rule or statute, courts may not require detailed factual allegations or prima facie case elements at the pleading stage.
Supporting sources
…case presents the antecedent question of what a plaintiff must plead in order to state a claim under § 1 of the Sherman Act. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires only "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief," in order to "give the defendant fair notice of what the . . . claim is and the…