Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A response or statement in legal proceedings, discovery, or bar matters that is false or constitutes a sham.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Attorney False Filing Response
Fabian Flynn, counsel for a hospital defendant, signed discovery responses denying the existence of internal morbidity reports after only consulting risk management staff. The reports existed under a different electronic category. The court imposed sanctions on counsel and the hospital because the certification was improper and not substantially justified.
Conviction for Impeachment Use
Faith Fitzgerald testified as a curator in a copyright suit. The plaintiff sought to introduce her prior conviction for submitting gallery provenance papers containing inaccuracies. The court admitted the conviction because the elements required proof of a dishonest act or false statement.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Federal Rules
Model Codes
Common Law
Restatements
Dictionaries
Lawyer Letter to Third Party
Francesca Fiore, outside counsel, responded to a bar questionnaire by stating there were no known incidents of dishonesty in an applicant's employment history. She had received secondhand reports of falsified mileage disclosures. The statement contradicted information already in her possession.
Bar Admission Certification
Fatou Fall submitted a certification letter stating that no issues had ever been raised about an applicant's honesty with regulators. She knew of a prior regulatory interview focused on possible deceptive reporting. The letter omitted that inquiry despite the bar application's direct question.
Newspaper Article Accusation
Foster Forge published an article accusing a university president of ordering improper admissions decisions. The president sued for defamation. The court required proof that the publication occurred with knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth.
New York Times v. Sullivan376 U.S. 254 (1964)
Credit Report Statement Dispute
Frostline Textiles sued a credit reporting agency over a publication that harmed its business reputation. The court examined whether the statements qualified as false assertions of fact made with actual malice rather than protected opinion.
Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.472 U.S. 749 (1985)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What distinguishes a false answer from an evasive answer in discovery?+
A false answer affirmatively misstates facts or denies the existence of responsive materials. An evasive answer fails to admit or deny directly and is treated as a failure to answer under the rules.
When does a prior conviction involving a false statement become automatically admissible for impeachment?+
The conviction is admitted if the court can readily determine that its elements required proof or admission of a dishonest act or false statement, regardless of punishment or case type.
Does Rule 8.1(a) require actual knowledge that a statement is false?+
Yes. The rule prohibits knowingly making a false statement of material fact in connection with a bar admission application. A lawyer must possess actual awareness of the falsity at the time the statement is made.
How does the actual malice standard apply to defamation claims by public officials?+
A public official must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant published the false statement with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth.
376 U.S. 254 (1964)Remedies
…know, at times, resorts to exaggeration, to vilification of men who have been, or are, prominent in church or state, and even to false statement. But the people of this nation have ordained in the light of history, that, in spite of the probability of excesses and abuses, these liberties are, in the long view, essential to…