Also known as:evasions · evasive · evasively · evade
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An act or course of conduct by which a person or entity seeks to avoid a legal obligation, rule, or judicial process. The conduct often exploits technicalities, loopholes, or informal means to frustrate enforcement or review while stopping short of outright violation.
Sources & Authorities· 3 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Restatements
Dictionaries
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Tax-Evasion Conviction Triggers Discipline
Elijah Edwards, a licensed attorney, was convicted of willfully attempting to evade income taxes by underreporting earnings through offshore accounts. The disciplinary board imposed sanctions based on the criminal conduct alone. The conviction reflected adversely on his honesty and fitness to practice regardless of the criminal sentence imposed.
Informal Statements Used to Evade Confrontation
Esme Ellington gave statements to police during an informal emergency call after an assault. Prosecutors offered the statements at trial to prove the identity of her attacker. The defense argued the statements were produced to evade the formalized testimonial process that triggers confrontation rights.
Davis v. Washington547 U.S. 813 (2006)
Federal Action Encourages Evasion of State Procedures
Emma Erickson challenged a city zoning ordinance in federal court before exhausting state administrative remedies. The court declined to intervene, noting that premature federal relief would encourage evasion and undermine important state interests embodied in regulatory procedures.
Moore v. City of East Cleveland, Ohio431 U.S. 494, 503 (1977)
Suspect's Evasive Actions Extend Detention
Edith Eberhardt was detained during an investigatory stop. Officers extended the detention to twenty minutes because her evasive answers and contradictory statements delayed the investigation. The court held the extension reasonable under the totality of the circumstances.
Mullaney v. Wilbur421 U.S. 684, 95 S.Ct. 1881, 44 L.Ed.2d 508 (1975)
Short-Duration Action Evades Full Review
Ella Emerson challenged a temporary restraining order that expired before appellate review could occur. The court applied the capable-of-repetition-yet-evading-review exception because the same party faced a reasonable likelihood of identical short-duration action in the future.
Shaffer v. Heitner433 U.S. 186 (1977)
Punitive Award Reduced to Prevent Evasion of Limits
Enigma Technologies was hit with a massive punitive damages verdict. The court reduced the award, explaining that an excessive ratio would allow plaintiffs to evade constitutional limits on punishment by recharacterizing compensatory damages as punitive.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell538 U.S. 408, 123 S.Ct. 1513, 155 L.Ed.2d 585 (2003)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
Does a tax-evasion conviction automatically subject a lawyer to professional discipline?+
Yes. A conviction for willfully attempting to evade income taxes constitutes criminal conduct that reflects adversely on honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer. Discipline may be imposed independent of the criminal sentence.
Supporting sources
When does an injunction risk permitting evasion by the defendant?+
An injunction risks permitting evasion when its terms are drafted so narrowly that the defendant can comply while still achieving the prohibited result. Courts must draft orders with reasonable precision to avoid this outcome while still making enforcement practicable.
How do courts assess whether a suspect's evasive actions justify extending an investigatory stop?+
Courts evaluate the totality of the circumstances. A suspect's evasive answers or contradictory statements that delay the investigation can render a twenty-minute detention reasonable when officers pursue their inquiry diligently.
Supporting sources
What conditions must exist for the capable-of-repetition-yet-evading-review exception to apply?+
The exception applies only when the same complaining party faces a reasonable expectation of repetition and the challenged action is inherently short in duration so that it will consistently evade full judicial review.
Supporting sources
Why do forced-share statutes count certain lifetime gifts as part of the decedent's estate?+
Counting irrevocable gifts made in anticipation of imminent death prevents easy evasion of the surviving spouse's elective share through death-bed transfers or will substitutes that would otherwise remove assets from the probate estate.
Supporting sources
evade
the strictures of the Constitution and in effect enact Executive proposals into law by mere silence cannot be squared with Art. I. [^maj-1]: As JUSTICE WHITE's dissenting opinion explains,…
§203 altogether. Nonprofit corporations that want to make unrestricted electioneering expenditures may do so if they refuse donations from businesses and unions and permit members to…
EvidencePresentation of evidence · Mode and orderUBEIntermediate