Also known as: waiver doctrine · waiver
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A principle by which a party intentionally relinquishes a known legal right. The relinquishment prevents later assertion of the right when the opposing party has relied on the waiver or when fairness requires enforcement of the relinquishment.
Denise Donovan leased a warehouse from Duarte Shipping knowing the roof leaked. She took possession and paid rent for three months while requesting repairs. Duarte Shipping failed to fix the roof. Denise Donovan then stopped paying rent and sued for damages. Her continued occupancy after the request did not waive the claim because Duarte Shipping never corrected the defect.
Dylan Duffy appeared in federal court charged with wire fraud. The judge conducted a detailed colloquy confirming Dylan Duffy understood the charges, the role of counsel, and the risks of self-representation. Dylan Duffy signed a written waiver and proceeded pro se. The court accepted the waiver as knowing and intelligent, allowing the trial to continue without appointed counsel.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Daphne Doyle signed a premarital agreement drafted by her fiancé's attorney. The document contained no conspicuous notice explaining the rights she was relinquishing and she had no independent counsel. After the marriage ended, Daphne Doyle sought to set aside the agreement. The absence of the required waiver notice prevented enforcement of the relinquishment of marital property rights.
Doris Duffy placed her child for adoption after the biological father abandoned the family. The father refused consent despite having no contact for two years. A court found the withholding unreasonable and contrary to the child's best interests. The father's consent was waived after notice and a hearing, allowing the adoption to proceed.
Dover Bank received a waiver-of-service request in a contract suit filed by Diamond Manufacturing. The bank returned the signed waiver within sixty days. Because the waiver was timely, Dover Bank had sixty days rather than twenty-one to file its answer. The extended period governed the response deadline.
David Dawson owned shares in Dillon Energy. The corporation sent notice of the annual meeting only eight days before the date. David Dawson signed a written waiver of notice and delivered it to the corporation before the meeting. The waiver allowed the meeting to proceed and the votes cast to be valid despite the short notice.
The party must demonstrate that the waiving party had actual knowledge of the right and intentionally relinquished it. Courts examine the surrounding circumstances, including any writing or conduct that clearly manifests the intent to forgo the right.
Supporting sources
Waiver rests on the intentional relinquishment of a known right. Estoppel requires a representation or conduct that induces reasonable reliance by the other party to its detriment. The two defenses are distinct even though courts sometimes blur the labels.
Supporting sources
Attendance alone does not waive the defect unless the shareholder objects at the outset or a written waiver signed by the shareholder is delivered to the corporation. Continued participation without a signed writing leaves the notice defect intact.
Supporting sources
Prior knowledge is only one factor in assessing whether the interference is unreasonable. It does not automatically bar relief unless the plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily accepted the precise risk that later materialized.
Supporting sources
…right. The District Court did not so find. It has been pointed out that “courts indulge every reasonable presumption against waiver” of fundamental constitutional rights[^maj-12] and that we “do not presume acquiescence in the loss of fundamental rights.”[^maj-13] A waiver is ordinarily an intentional relinquishment or…