Also known as: dissipates the taint · dissipated the taint · dissipating the taint · dissipation of the taint · dissipation of taint
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A doctrine under which evidence obtained after an unconstitutional search or seizure becomes admissible when intervening events or time have sufficiently attenuated the causal connection to the initial illegality. Courts weigh temporal proximity between the violation and the evidence, the presence of intervening circumstances such as a voluntary act of free will or an independent lawful basis for action, and the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Detectives forced entry into David Dawson's apartment without a warrant and seized his laptop. Three weeks later David returned voluntarily to the station, received Miranda warnings, and confessed while directing officers to an offsite server. The court admitted the confession and server logs because the substantial time gap and David's independent decision to appear and speak broke the causal chain from the initial unlawful entry.
Officers arrested Denise Donovan without probable cause and obtained an immediate statement. After her arraignment and release on recognizance, Denise returned several days later and gave a second statement. The later statement was admitted because her release and voluntary return constituted an intervening act of free will that dissipated any taint from the unlawful arrest.
An officer stopped Destiny Davis on a pretext and discovered an outstanding warrant for an unrelated offense. The officer arrested her on the warrant and found drugs during a search incident to arrest. The drugs were admitted because the preexisting valid warrant supplied an intervening circumstance that sufficiently attenuated the connection to the initial unlawful stop.
An officer detained Deborah Dunn without reasonable suspicion and learned of a valid outstanding warrant during the encounter. The officer arrested her on the warrant and discovered evidence in a search incident to arrest. The evidence was admissible because the warrant, entirely unconnected to the stop, constituted a significant intervening circumstance that dissipated the taint.
Officers unlawfully entered Devon Drake's home and seized his computer. After release Devon voluntarily appeared at the station days later, received Miranda warnings, and confessed. The confession was admitted because the passage of time and Devon's independent choice to return and speak sufficiently attenuated any connection to the initial unlawful entry.
Police arrested Dorothy Daniels without probable cause and obtained an immediate incriminating statement. After arraignment and release on her own recognizance Dorothy returned voluntarily several days later and gave a second statement. The later statement was admissible because her release and voluntary return created sufficient attenuation to dissipate the taint from the unlawful arrest.
Courts examine temporal proximity between the illegality and the evidence, the presence of intervening circumstances such as a voluntary act of free will or an independent lawful basis for action, and the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct.
Supporting sources
A preexisting valid warrant discovered during an unlawful stop can constitute a significant intervening circumstance that dissipates the taint when the arrest and subsequent search rest on the warrant rather than the stop itself.
…Dunaway v. New York , 442 U. S. 200, 217-218 (1979); United States v. Ceccolini, supra , at 279.[^maj-7] In short, the "dissipation of the taint" concept that the Court has applied in deciding whether exclusion is appropriate in a particular case "attempts to mark the point at which the detrimental consequences of illegal police…
…custody when he made the statement. The connection between the illegal arrest and the statement had become so attenuated as to dissipate the taint. The statement was therefore admissible. IV We turn finally to the heroin found in Yee's house. The Court of Appeals held that the heroin was admissible because it was not the fruit…
…between the lawless conduct of the police and the discovery of the challenged evidence has "become so attenuated as to dissipate the taint." ' " 435 U. S., at 273-274. It is also suprising to learn that the issues in Stone v. Powell are "distinct" from the Fourth Amendment. [^maj-5]: Consider the full context of the…
…cost on the legitimate demands of law enforcement than can be justified by the rule’s deterrent purposes. The notion of the “dissipation of the taint
…warrant favors finding that the connection between unlawful conduct and the discovery of evidence is "sufficiently attenuated to dissipate the taint
Supporting sources
A confession given days after release on recognizance, following Miranda warnings and without ongoing custody, is often admissible because the release and voluntary return represent an intervening act of free will that breaks the causal chain.
Supporting sources
The presence of retained counsel at a later voluntary interview weighs strongly in favor of attenuation because it demonstrates an independent decision by the suspect and reduces any lingering coercive effect from the initial illegality.
Supporting sources
A grand jury subpoena issued weeks after an unlawful search may dissipate the taint when the subpoena rests on an internal review process and institutional prosecutorial judgment rather than direct exploitation of the illegally obtained information.
Supporting sources