Also known as: civil liberty
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Rights or freedoms protected from governmental interference, primarily under the First Amendment and other constitutional provisions, allowing individuals to speak, think, assemble, worship, and petition without undue restriction.
Clifford Cox contacted an attorney about restrictions on public funding that threatened his nonprofit's workshops on voting rights. The attorney agreed to handle the funding dispute at a substantially reduced fee because standard rates would force the organization to cancel its community programs. The arrangement allowed the nonprofit to continue its advocacy without depleting its limited resources.
Carmen Choi operated a website that hosted discussions on political topics. Federal officials sought to enforce a statute that broadly restricted indecent material accessible to adults. The court struck down the statute because it lacked reliable age-screening technology and unduly burdened protected expression.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Catherine Carter and her partner sought a marriage license in a state that refused to recognize same-sex unions. They argued that the refusal violated their fundamental liberty interest in forming a family. The Supreme Court held that states must license and recognize such marriages to protect the right to personal autonomy.
Colin Chambers's apartment was searched without a warrant by federal agents. He filed a damages action claiming a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. The court recognized an implied cause of action allowing recovery for the constitutional injury.
Caleb Chang was charged under a federal statute for possessing a firearm near a school. He challenged the law as exceeding Congress's commerce power. The Supreme Court invalidated the statute because it lacked a sufficient connection to interstate commerce and intruded on traditional state authority over education.
Christine Castro was arrested and questioned at length without being advised of her rights. Her statements were later used at trial. The Supreme Court held that the statements were inadmissible because the warnings are necessary to safeguard the privilege against self-incrimination.
The rule permits lawyers to provide services at no fee or a substantially reduced fee to organizations seeking to secure or protect civil liberties when standard fees would deplete resources. This encourages representation in matters involving public rights and organizational purposes. It forms part of the aspirational fifty-hour pro bono goal.
Supporting sources
Courts weigh the privacy harms alleged by the plaintiff against the benefits to third parties and the public at large. Evidence of crime reduction is relevant to the equitable analysis of an injunction request. The decision rests on that balance rather than on the named parties alone.
Supporting sources
A federal court may grant prospective injunctive relief against a state officer enforcing a rule that allegedly violates federal constitutional rights. The suit is treated as one against the officer acting outside lawful authority rather than against the state itself. This exception permits ongoing violations to be halted.
Supporting sources
…vested legal right. Second, if he has a right and that right has been violated do the laws afford him a remedy? The essence of civil liberty consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws whenever he receives an injury. It is a general rule that where there is a legal right there is also a legal…