Also known as:burden of proof · burden of proofs · onus probandi
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A procedural mechanism that assigns to each party the responsibility to introduce evidence and ultimately persuade the factfinder regarding specific elements or defenses in a lawsuit. The mechanism encompasses the burden of production to come forward with evidence and the burden of persuasion to convince the factfinder by the applicable standard.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Shifted Causation in Quarry Blast
Benito Benitez suffered injury from flying debris after two neighboring quarries detonated explosives on the same afternoon. He proved both operators had been negligent in their blasting procedures but could not identify which blast caused his harm. Each operator must now demonstrate that its own conduct did not produce the injury.
Will Contest Allocation
Bruce Baldwin petitioned to probate his uncle's will while a niece filed a contest alleging undue influence. Baldwin first presented evidence of proper execution and the testator's death. The niece then bore the task of proving lack of capacity or undue influence by a preponderance.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Restatements
Casebooks
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
Bianca Blanco's farm suffered crop loss after two upstream factories released pollutants that combined in the river. Both factories conceded their discharges were negligent. Each factory must prove the portion of harm attributable solely to its own waste to limit its liability.
Gender Classification Challenge
Bernard Bass challenged a state university policy reserving certain athletic scholarships exclusively for women. The state defended the classification by asserting it promoted diversity in sports. The university must demonstrate an exceedingly persuasive justification substantially related to an important objective.
Plaintiff Causation Burden
Brianna Burke alleged that a single defendant's defective ladder caused her fall and injuries. She introduced evidence linking the ladder's collapse to her harm. Burke must persuade the jury that the defendant's tortious conduct was the cause in fact of her injuries.
Reliance Presumption in Securities
Benjamin Brooks purchased shares of Barclay Financial after the company issued misleading public statements. He sued under Rule 10b-5 alleging the statements inflated the price. The court applied a presumption that Brooks relied on the integrity of the market price when trading.
Basic Inc. v. Levinson485 U.S. [224], at 238 1988
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
Who carries the burden of proving causation in a standard negligence case?+
The plaintiff must prove that the defendant's tortious conduct caused the harm. This allocation appears in the general rule that the burden of proof on causation rests on the plaintiff unless an exception such as alternative liability applies.
What burden does a will contestant bear under the Uniform Probate Code?+
A contestant must establish lack of testamentary capacity, undue influence, fraud, duress, mistake, or revocation. The proponent first satisfies the burden of showing due execution.
When does the burden of proof on apportionment shift in multi-actor tort cases?+
When multiple actors' tortious conduct combines to cause harm and an actor seeks to limit liability by showing apportionment is possible, that actor bears the burden of proving the proper division of damages.
How does intermediate scrutiny allocate the burden in gender classification cases?+
The government must supply an exceedingly persuasive justification showing the classification is substantially related to an important objective. The justification must be genuine and may not rest on overbroad stereotypes.
410 U.S. 113 (1973)Constitutional Law
…or overbroad." A physician's abortion conviction was affirmed. In Thompson , n. 2, the court observed that any issue as to the burden of proof under the exemption of Art. 1196 "is not before us." But see Veevers v. State , 172 Tex. Cr. R. 162, 168-169, 354 S. W. 2d 161, 166-167 (1962). Cf. United States v. Vuitch , 402 U. S.…