Also known as:beyond all bounds of decency · outrageous conduct
Written by attorneys — see sources below.
Conduct so outrageous in character and extreme in degree that it exceeds the limits of what a civilized community will tolerate. The standard identifies behavior that is atrocious rather than merely rude or annoying.
See Our Sources
How its tested
Common Examples
6
Sustained Intimidation Campaign
After Jordan Lee posted a negative review, supervisor Dana Ruiz flagged the account for special handling and directed agents to tell Jordan that law enforcement was monitoring calls for terrorism. Dana also arranged repeated late-night robocalls containing ominous threats. Jordan developed severe anxiety, insomnia, and stress-related ulcers.
Retaliatory False Diagnosis
Dr. Lopez, angry at patient Maria Reyes for complaining about prior care, called her into a consultation room and graphically described an untreatable disfiguring disease that he knew the lab results did not show. He refused to correct the lie for several hours. Maria suffered repeated panic attacks and severe insomnia.
Zara organized twenty demonstrators to stand on the public sidewalk beside a cemetery during Leah's private burial service. The group held large signs labeling Leah's deceased father a slumlord and chanted accusations linking him to local homelessness. Leah and the grieving family inside the cemetery grounds suffered severe emotional distress.
Snyder v. Phelps562 U.S. 443 (2011)
Marine Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder was killed in action in Iraq. His father, Albert Snyder, arranged for the funeral to be held in Westminster, Maryland. Members of the Westboro Baptist Church, an unincorporated association founded by Fred Phelps, learned of the funeral through local newspapers and decided to picket it to communicate their belief that God punishes the United States for its tolerance of homosexuality.
On the day of the funeral, Westboro members displayed placards on public land approximately 1,000 feet from the church where the service was held. The signs included messages such as "God Hates the USA," "Thank God for Dead Soldiers," "Pope in Hell," "Priests Rape Boys," "You’re Going to Hell," and "God Hates Fags." The picketing took place for about 30 minutes before the funeral began. The funeral procession passed within 200 to 300 feet of the picketers. Church members also posted an online "epic" that discussed Matthew Snyder’s funeral and criticized his parents.
Albert Snyder filed a diversity action in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland against Fred Phelps, his daughters, and the Westboro Baptist Church. The suit alleged claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress, intrusion upon seclusion, and civil conspiracy. A jury found for Snyder and awarded $2.9 million in compensatory damages and $8 million in punitive damages.
The district court reduced the punitive damages award to $2.1 million but left the verdict otherwise intact. The Fourth Circuit reversed the judgment, holding that Westboro’s statements were protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to review whether the First Amendment shields the church members from tort liability for their picketing speech.
After a tanker spill, Exxon Shipping's executives approved a captain known for alcohol problems to command the vessel. The resulting massive discharge caused widespread environmental harm that a jury found resulted from reckless indifference. The jury awarded punitive damages to punish the corporation and deter similar future conduct.
Media Broadcast Dispute
A television station broadcast reports labeling Rosenbloom a participant in a criminal ring. The reports were later shown to be false and caused Rosenbloom significant reputational and emotional harm. Rosenbloom sued the station for defamation and related emotional distress.
Witnessed Threat to Child
Dr. Lang berated junior researcher Maya in a lab and graphically described how she would be blamed for patient deaths and sent to prison. Maya's mother Lila stood across the bench and heard the entire tirade. Lila later suffered severe emotional distress.
4 common questions
Students Frequently Ask...
What conduct meets the beyond all possible bounds of decency standard?
The standard is satisfied only when the defendant's behavior is so outrageous in character and extreme in degree that it would be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community. Mere insults, indignities, or petty oppressions fall short.
Does the presence of a power imbalance affect whether conduct exceeds all bounds of decency?
Yes. Courts consider whether the defendant exploited a position of authority or control over a vulnerable plaintiff, such as a supervisor threatening a migrant worker or a physician lying to a patient about a diagnosis.
Supporting sources
Can a single incident satisfy the beyond all possible bounds of decency test?
A single incident can qualify if it is sufficiently extreme, such as a surgeon fabricating a terminal diagnosis to retaliate against a complaining patient. Repetition is not required but strengthens the finding of outrageousness.
Supporting sources
How does the standard apply when outrageous conduct is directed at a third person?
An immediate family member present at the time may recover for resulting severe emotional distress even without bodily harm. A non-family bystander present at the time may recover only if the distress produces bodily harm.
Supporting sources
; (2) that the
conduct
was so
outrageous
in character and so extreme in degree as to go
beyond all possible bounds of decency
; (3) that the
conduct
caused the plaintiff to suffer severe emotional distress; and (4) that the defendant’s
conduct
was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s emotional distress. The…