Also known as: artificial inseminations · artificially inseminated · AID · AIH
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A reproductive technique by which semen is placed in a woman's reproductive tract by means other than sexual intercourse. When a married woman undergoes the procedure with her husband's consent and a licensed physician performs it, statutes commonly treat the husband as the legal father of the child. A sperm donor ordinarily acquires no parental rights or support obligations toward the resulting child.
Michael and Laura Bennett decided Laura would undergo artificial insemination using donor sperm. Michael signed the required consent form at the clinic before the procedure. After the child was born, statutes treated Michael as the legal father with full support obligations.
Brian Carter supplied sperm to a clinic for Sarah and Emily Dalton's artificial insemination. The couple later separated and Brian sought visitation. The court held that Brian retained no parental rights because he was only a donor.
Rachel Evans, an unmarried woman, arranged artificial insemination at a licensed clinic. She selected an anonymous donor through the facility's standard process. The resulting child had no legal father and Rachel held sole parental rights.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
David and Jennifer Foster used artificial insemination performed by their family physician. David had given written consent before the procedure. The child was therefore deemed legitimate and entitled to support from both spouses.
Karen and Thomas Green used artificial insemination with sperm from an anonymous donor. After divorce Thomas claimed he was not obligated to support the child. The court enforced the statute treating the consenting husband as the legal father.
Nancy and Robert Hill conceived a child through artificial insemination with Robert's consent. When Robert died intestate the child claimed a share of the estate. Statutes granted the child the same inheritance rights as a naturally conceived child of the marriage.
Consent by the husband is required under many statutes for him to be treated as the legal father. Without consent, parentage may not attach automatically to the husband. Courts look to the husband's agreement at the time of the procedure to determine support obligations.
Supporting sources
Statutes generally provide that a sperm donor has no parental rights or obligations to the child. A few courts have awarded limited visitation in unusual circumstances such as lesbian-couple arrangements. The Uniform Parentage Act reinforces the rule that the donor is not a parent.
Supporting sources
Many statutes expressly legitimize the child as the product of the marriage when the husband consents. The child receives the same legal status as a naturally conceived child of the spouses. This rule protects the child's support rights and inheritance.
Supporting sources
Artificial insemination is available to unmarried women, though some commentators have raised policy concerns about single-parent outcomes. Statutes focus on the consent and medical requirements rather than marital status. Courts have upheld the practice for unmarried recipients.
Supporting sources
…than an event, and by new medical techniques such as menstrual extraction, the "morning-after" pill, implantation of embryos, artificial insemination, and even artificial wombs.[^maj-62] In areas other than criminal abortion, the law has been reluctant to endorse any theory that life, as we recognize it, begins before live birth or to…