Also known as:wrongfully enjoin · wrongfully enjoining · wrongful enjoinment · wrongful injunction
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
The status of a party subjected to a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order without sufficient legal basis. The finding permits that party to recover costs and damages from the security posted by the movant.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Bond Recovery After Dissolved Injunction
Warren Wu obtained a preliminary injunction halting Waverly Insurance from processing claims. The court later dissolved the order after finding no likelihood of success on the merits. Waverly Insurance incurred substantial attorney fees defending the restraint. It recovered those fees from the security that the court required Warren Wu to post.
Attorney Fees Awarded on Wrongful Restraint
Willow West secured a temporary restraining order against Winslow Aviation. The order was later held improvidently granted. Winslow Aviation documented attorney fees spent defending the restraint. The court awarded those fees against the bond posted by Willow West.
Put it into practice
Test Yourself
9
Practice Questions5
· 1 primary source
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Federal Rules
Study Supplements
Saunders v. Sharp793 P.2d 927 (Utah Ct. App. 1990)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What damages can a wrongfully enjoined party recover from the bond?+
Recoverable damages include attorney fees incurred defending against the restraint. Courts have held that such fees qualify as costs and damages under the security requirement when the injunction is later found wrongful.
Supporting sources
Does the security requirement apply to private plaintiffs seeking nationwide injunctions?+
Yes. A private movant must post security in an amount the court considers proper. The only categorical exemption applies to the United States, its officers, and its agencies.
Supporting sources
Can a court waive the bond entirely for a nonprofit or public-interest plaintiff?+
No. The rule requires some security from any nongovernmental movant. A court may reduce the amount based on equitable factors but may not dispense with the requirement altogether.
Supporting sources
How does a court determine the proper bond amount when the movant has limited resources?+
The court exercises discretion to set an amount it considers proper after weighing the enjoined party's projected losses against the movant's ability to pay and the public interest. The rule does not mandate a bond equal to every possible loss.
Supporting sources
Civil ProcedurePretrial procedures · Preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining ordersUBEFoundational