Also known as:visitation determinations · visitation order · custody visitation ruling
Written by attorneys — see sources below.
A judgment, decree, or other order of a court providing for the visitation of a child. The term encompasses permanent and temporary orders as well as initial orders and modifications.
See Our Sources
How its tested
Common Examples
2
Agreed Modification of Schedule
Vaughn Valentine and Vera Vargas share a child under an existing visitation order. They later agree in writing to adjust the schedule so that Vaughn receives additional holiday time. The court enters the new order after confirming that the change serves the child's best interests and does not require further litigation.
Interstate Enforcement Dispute
After a court in one state issues a visitation determination granting Vivian Velez weekend access, the other parent relocates with the child to a second state. Vivian petitions the new state court to enforce the original order. The court treats the decree as a visitation determination entitled to full faith and credit and declines to modify it absent a showing that the issuing state has lost jurisdiction.
Timothy Abbott, a British citizen, and Jacquelyn Abbott, a United States citizen, married in England in 1992. Their son A. J. A. was born in Hawaii in 1995 after the couple moved there for Mr. Abbott’s astronomy work. The family relocated to La Serena, Chile, in 2002, where marital discord led to separation in March 2003.
Chilean courts granted the mother daily care and control of A. J. A. while awarding the father direct and regular visitation rights, including every other weekend and the full month of February each year. Under Minors Law 16,618, article 49, Chilean law conferred a ne exeat right on the father requiring his authorization before the child could leave the country. The mother obtained a ne exeat order from the Chilean family court prohibiting removal of the boy.
In August 2005, while proceedings remained pending before the Chilean court, the mother removed A. J. A. from Chile to Texas without permission from the father or the court. A private investigator later located the mother and child in Texas. The mother filed for divorce in Texas state court in February 2006, seeking modification of the father’s rights including sole authority over the child’s residence.
Mr. Abbott filed an action in Texas state court requesting visitation and an order to show cause why the child should not return to Chile. The state court denied return but granted liberal visitation periods in Texas during February 2006. In May 2006, Mr. Abbott filed suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas under the Hague Convention and the International Child Abduction Remedies Act seeking the child’s return to Chile.
After a bench trial at which only Mr. Abbott testified, the District Court denied relief in July 2007. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed on the same rationale. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve a conflict among the circuits on the status of ne exeat rights.
It includes any judgment, decree, or court order that provides for a child's visitation. The definition covers both permanent and temporary orders as well as initial orders and later modifications.
When may a court modify a visitation determination by agreement?
On the parties' agreement the court may modify a custody or visitation order unless it finds the agreement is not in the child's best interest.
Does the Constitution limit statutes that allow broad third-party visitation?
Yes. The Due Process Clause protects a fit parent's fundamental right to direct a child's upbringing. A statute permitting any person to obtain visitation based solely on a judge's independent best-interests finding, without according special weight to the fit parent's decision, is unconstitutional as applied.
How does the PKPA treat a visitation determination from another state?
A state must enforce a visitation determination made consistently with the PKPA by a court of another state and may not modify it unless the issuing state no longer has jurisdiction or has declined to exercise it.
560 U.S. 1 (2010)
…it authorizes him, pursuant to Article 21, to seek assistance from this country in carrying out the Chilean family court’s visitation order. III Although the Court recognizes, as it must, that “ ‘[t]he interpretation of a treaty, like the interpretation of a statute, begins with its text,’ ” ante, at 6 (quoting…