Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A period of time that is excessive or unreasonable under the circumstances when the passage of time prejudices another party or the judicial process.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Compromise Evidence to Rebut Delay Claim
Ugo Uberti sued Ultrasonic Dynamics for breach of a supply contract. At trial Ultrasonic sought to introduce a letter in which Uberti had offered a reduced settlement amount. Uberti objected under the compromise rule. The court admitted the letter solely to show that Uberti had not been prejudiced by any supposed delay in filing suit.
Cover Purchase After Seller Breach
Ulysses Maritime contracted to buy replacement engines from Umbra Technologies. After Umbra repudiated, Ulysses located substitute engines from two other suppliers and completed the purchases within ten days. Ulysses then sued for the price difference. The court found the purchases satisfied the cover requirements because they occurred without unreasonable delay.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Restatements
Casebooks
Injunction Sought After Long Inaction
Umeko Uchida waited eight years after discovering a continuing nuisance before seeking an injunction against her neighbor. The neighbor had invested heavily in the disputed structure during that period. The court denied the injunction in part because Uchida's extended inaction constituted unreasonable delay that weighed against equitable relief.
Evidence Excluded for Trial Inefficiency
Uri Underwood offered twenty hours of deposition video to prove a single minor fact in a contract dispute. The opposing party objected that the presentation would consume excessive court time. The court excluded most of the video because its marginal probative value was substantially outweighed by the danger of undue delay.
Injunction Barred by Plaintiff Inaction
Ulf Ulfsson discovered ongoing trespass on his land but waited six years to sue for an injunction. During that time the defendant built permanent improvements. The court refused injunctive relief after weighing the plaintiff's unreasonable delay among the equitable factors.
Psychotherapist Privilege and Delay Concerns
Una Unger sought production of a police officer's counseling records in a civil rights action. The officer invoked the psychotherapist privilege. The court balanced the need for the evidence against the risk that compelled disclosure would cause undue delay in resolving the litigation and ultimately upheld the privilege.
Jaffee v. Redmond51 F.3d 1346, 1355 (7th Cir. 1994)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
How does undue delay affect a motion for leave to amend a pleading?+
A court may deny leave to amend when the movant has engaged in undue delay that prejudices the opposing party or the judicial process. The delay must be unreasonable and not merely the passage of time. The opposing party bears the burden of showing prejudice.
Supporting sources
When is delay in making a cover purchase unreasonable under the UCC?+
Delay is unreasonable when the buyer fails to act in good faith and with reasonable promptness after learning of the seller's breach. Courts measure reasonableness by commercial standards and the buyer's need to maintain operations.
Supporting sources
Does undue delay alone bar an injunction in tort cases?+
No. Unreasonable delay by the plaintiff is only one of several factors a court weighs when deciding whether to grant an injunction. The court also considers the nature of the interest, relative hardship, and any misconduct by the plaintiff.
Supporting sources
How does Rule 403 treat the danger of undue delay?+
Rule 403 permits exclusion of relevant evidence when its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of undue delay, among other risks. The court must balance the evidence's usefulness against the time and confusion its presentation would create.
Supporting sources
384 U.S. 436 (1966)Evidence
…to communicate and to consult privately with a solicitor. This is so even if he is in custody provided that in such a case no unreasonable delay or hindrance is caused to the processes of investigation or the administration of justice by his doing so . . . ." [1964] Crim. L. Rev., at 166-167. [^maj-59]: As stated by the Lord…