Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Conduct that renders a contract or term unenforceable because it produces oppression or unfair surprise at the time of formation. Courts examine the setting, purpose, and effect of the bargain, including defects in the bargaining process and gross disparity in the exchange.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Mistake Renders Enforcement Oppressive
Ultra Precision contracted to supply specialized parts to Ulysses Maritime at a fixed low price after both sides assumed a key patent remained active. Actual production yields proved far lower than the preliminary data Ultra Precision had treated as sufficient. Enforcement would force the supplier into ruinous losses that shock the conscience.
Separation Agreement Shows Economic Disparity
Una Unger and Uriah Urban signed a separation agreement dividing pensions and setting modest maintenance after twelve years of marriage. A post-signing audit revealed that Uriah had substantially undervalued his government pension. The resulting imbalance in retirement security and maintenance, viewed against the parties' economic circumstances, renders the agreement unconscionable.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Uniform Acts
Restatements
Casebooks
Premarital Term Creates Hardship
Uma Underwood and Ulrike Ulrich signed a premarital agreement waiving spousal support. After the marriage ended, enforcement would leave Uma eligible for public assistance because of a material change in circumstances arising after signing. The court refuses to enforce the support-waiver term.
Consumer Goods Damage Limit Shocks Conscience
United Bank sold a consumer appliance to Ugo Ucelli under a contract that excluded consequential damages for personal injury. The exclusion is prima facie unconscionable because the goods are consumer products and the limitation leaves the buyer without remedy for foreseeable harm.
Court Limits Application of Oppressive Term
Ultra Precision and Ulysses Maritime entered a supply contract containing a term that would require the supplier to absorb all losses from unexpectedly low yields. The court refuses to enforce the unconscionable term but enforces the remainder of the agreement after limiting its application to avoid an oppressive result.
Court Orders Revised Agreement or Own Disposition
Una Unger and Uriah Urban's separation agreement is found unconscionable because of undisclosed pension undervaluation and resulting economic disparity. The court requests a revised agreement correcting the valuation or issues its own orders allocating property, maintenance, and support consistent with the parties' actual circumstances.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
What factors does a court consider when determining whether conduct renders a contract unconscionable?+
Courts examine the setting, purpose, and effect of the bargain, including weaknesses in the contracting process such as fraud or lack of capacity, gross disparity in the values exchanged, and whether the term produces oppression or unfair surprise.
Supporting sources
How does unconscionability differ between commercial contracts and consumer-goods transactions under the UCC?+
Limitation of consequential damages for personal injury in consumer goods is prima facie unconscionable, while the same limitation in a purely commercial setting is not.
Supporting sources
What remedies are available when a separation agreement is found unconscionable?+
The court may request the parties to submit a revised agreement or may enter its own orders for property division, maintenance, and support.
Supporting sources
Does a post-signing change in circumstances alone make a premarital agreement term unconscionable?+
No. The term must have been unconscionable at the time of signing, or enforcement must produce substantial hardship because of a material change arising after signing.
Supporting sources
Can a court refuse to enforce only part of an unconscionable contract?+
Yes. The court may refuse to enforce the entire contract, enforce the remainder without the unconscionable term, or limit the application of the term to avoid an unconscionable result.
Supporting sources
32 N.J. 358, 161 A.2d 69 (1960)Torts
…and undue influence, not to mention differences in economic bargaining power” to enable the courts to avoid enforcement of unconscionable provisions in long printed standardized contracts. 1 Corbin on Contracts (1950) § 128, p. 188. Freedom of contract is not such an immutable doctrine as to admit of no qualification in the…