Also known as:tumultuous behaviours · disorderly conduct · breach of the peace
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Conduct involving violent or disorderly actions that disturb public order. It serves as an element of disorderly conduct when performed with purpose to cause public inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm or with reckless disregard for that risk.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Flag Protest Draws Crowd Attention
Tori Taylor burned a flag during a demonstration outside a federal building. Security officers observed her shouting loudly and gesturing aggressively toward bystanders who had gathered to watch. Her actions created immediate public alarm and prompted an arrest for disorderly conduct based on the tumultuous behavior.
Cross Burning Provokes Neighbors
Talia Torres and several companions assembled in a residential yard and ignited a cross. Residents across the street heard the group yelling threats and saw the flames, causing several to call police in fear of imminent violence. Officers cited the participants for disorderly conduct due to the tumultuous behavior in a public setting.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Restatements
Casebooks
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, Minnesota505 U.S. 377 (1992)
Conspiracy Meeting Turns Loud
Theo Thomas met with two associates in a crowded bar to plan an unlawful scheme. When one participant began shouting accusations and pounding the table, nearby patrons grew alarmed and summoned security. The resulting disturbance led to charges of disorderly conduct grounded in the tumultuous behavior.
Iannelli v. United States420 U.S. 770, 95 S.Ct. 1284, 43 L.Ed.2d 616
Lunch Counter Protest Escalates
Tiana Tan and fellow demonstrators refused to leave a restaurant after being told to depart. They began yelling at staff and banging on counters, drawing a crowd of alarmed customers. Police arrested the group for disorderly conduct based on the tumultuous behavior that risked an immediate breach of the peace.
Bouie v. City of Columbia(1964) 378 U.S. 347, 84 S.Ct. 1697, 12 L.Ed.2d 894
Online Threats Lead to Public Outcry
Timothy Tang posted repeated violent messages directed at a specific individual and then appeared in person repeating the threats at a public park. Witnesses reported feeling immediate fear and contacted authorities. The resulting confrontation produced a disorderly conduct charge resting on the tumultuous behavior.
Elonis v. United States575 U.S. _, 135 S. Ct. 2001 (2015)
School Demonstration Causes Alarm
Thaddeus Tran led a group of students in loud chanting and physical pushing near a school entrance during dismissal. Teachers and parents reported serious concern that the noise and shoving would spark a fight. School officials called police, resulting in a disorderly conduct citation for the tumultuous behavior.
Grayned v. City of Rockford408 U.S. 104, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What mental state must accompany tumultuous behavior to support a disorderly conduct conviction?+
The actor must act with purpose to cause public inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm, or recklessly create a risk of those harms. Mere loud or energetic conduct without that mental state does not qualify.
Does tumultuous behavior require actual violence or an immediate fight?+
No. The element is satisfied by conduct that is violent or disorderly enough to risk disturbing public order, even if no physical altercation occurs. The focus is on the risk created rather than realized harm.
How does the fighting words doctrine interact with a tumultuous behavior charge?+
Face-to-face abusive epithets that are likely to provoke immediate violence can constitute tumultuous behavior under disorderly conduct statutes. The speech loses First Amendment protection when it falls within the narrow fighting words category.
Can flag burning ever be charged as tumultuous behavior?+
Flag burning as political expression receives First Amendment protection absent an imminent breach of the peace. A disorderly conduct charge based solely on the communicative impact of the burning would be unconstitutional.
391 U.S. 145 (1968)Constitutional Law
…scheme, in which a State denies jury trial for a crime punishable by imprisonment for longer than six months. New Jersey's disorderly conduct offense, N. J. Stat. Ann. § 2A:169-4 (1953), carries a one-year maximum sentence but no jury trial. The denial of jury trial was upheld by a 4-3 vote against state constitutional attack in…