Also known as: relation back theory · relation-back theory · relation back · relation back doctrine · relation-back doctrine
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
2 senses
An amendment to a pleading relates back to the date of the original pleading when the law supplying the applicable statute of limitations permits relation back. This standard focuses on whether the amendment arises from the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence already pleaded and whether the defendant received timely notice. The rule incorporates state limitations doctrines that authorize relation back in diversity cases.
An amendment to a pleading relates back to the date of the original pleading when the law supplying the applicable statute of limitations permits relation back. This standard focuses on whether the amendment arises from the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence already pleaded and whether the defendant received timely notice. The rule incorporates state limitations doctrines that authorize relation back in diversity cases.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
A doctrine under which the exercise of a nongeneral or general testamentary power of appointment is treated as occurring at the time the donor created the power rather than when the donee exercises it. This approach determines validity under the rule against perpetuities by measuring the period from the power's creation. The doctrine does not apply to presently exercisable general powers.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
A doctrine under which the exercise of a nongeneral or general testamentary power of appointment is treated as occurring at the time the donor created the power rather than when the donee exercises it. This approach determines validity under the rule against perpetuities by measuring the period from the power's creation. The doctrine does not apply to presently exercisable general powers.
Each sense below has its own examples, sources, and questions.
Tiffany Torres sued a state agency in federal court under diversity jurisdiction for breach of a construction contract. After the state limitations period expired, she moved to add a statutory prompt-payment penalty claim arising from the same project. Because state law permits such claims to relate back when they concern the identical work, the court treated the amendment as filed on the original complaint date.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c)(1)(A) directs the court to apply the relation-back rule supplied by the law that provides the applicable statute of limitations. In diversity cases this means the forum state's limitations regime controls when it is more generous than the federal transactional test.
Supporting sources
Relation back is available when the new theory arises from the identical conduct, transaction, or occurrence already pleaded and the defendant had fair notice. State decisional law may treat malpractice and fiduciary-duty claims as interchangeable on the same facts, allowing relation back even though the elements differ.
Supporting sources
Tobias Thomas received a general testamentary power of appointment under his mother's will. He later exercised the power in favor of a trust benefiting his grandchildren. The validity of the appointment for rule-against-perpetuities purposes was measured from the date the mother created the power, not from Tobias's exercise.
The doctrine prevents the donee from creating interests that might vest too remotely. Measuring the perpetuities period from the donor's creation ensures the power cannot be exercised beyond a life in being plus twenty-one years.
Supporting sources