Also known as:thefts by deceit · theft by deception · larceny by trick
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A criminal offense committed when a person purposely obtains title to the property of another by creating or reinforcing a false impression about a past or existing fact with intent to defraud.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Advisor Induces Retiree Transfer
Leo met with retiree Marta and presented charts claiming guaranteed minimum returns plus government insurance backing for an investment fund. Leo knew both claims were false. Marta transferred her life savings in reliance on those statements. Leo thereby obtained title to Marta's money through knowing false representations of existing facts.
Developer Falsely Claims Code Rights
Lena told startup founders Oliver and Priya that her former employer had already assigned her rights to a nearly identical codebase. In fact the company still owned the code. Relying on that statement the founders executed documents transferring full ownership of their software tool to Lena. Lena thereby obtained title through a knowing misrepresentation of a past and existing fact.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Common Law
Study Supplements
Morrissette v. United States342 U.S. 246, 72 S.Ct. 240, 96 L.Ed. 288.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
How does theft by deceit differ from larceny by trick?+
Theft by deceit requires the victim to intend transfer of title while larceny by trick requires only an intent to transfer possession or custody. Courts look to the interest the victim meant to convey to decide which offense applies.
Supporting sources
Must the misrepresentation concern a past or existing fact?+
Yes. A false promise about future performance does not satisfy the element even if the defendant never intended to perform. The statement must address a past or existing fact such as current legal rights or completed reports.
Supporting sources
Does the victim need to suffer an actual out-of-pocket loss?+
No. The offense is complete once the defendant obtains title through the knowing misrepresentation. Later financial results do not affect whether the crime occurred.
Supporting sources
What distinguishes specific factual claims from mere puffing?+
Concrete assertions about legal backing, completed reports, or existing rights qualify as factual misrepresentations. Vague optimistic statements that ordinary people would not take literally do not.
Supporting sources
342 U.S. 246, 72 S.Ct. 240, 96 L.Ed. 288.Criminal Law
…twelve hundred and ninety of the penal law, was denominated a larceny, to wit: common law larceny by asportation, common law larceny by trick and device, obtaining property by false pretenses, and embezzlement.” [^maj-34]: Cf. Morgan, Instructing the Jury Upon Presumptions and Burden of Proof, 47 Harv. L. Rev. 59; Morgan, Some…
Criminal Law Constitutional ProtectionsStatutory crimes · TheftNEXTGENFoundational