In 1982 Texas enacted a sales and use tax exemption for periodicals published or distributed by a religious faith and consisting wholly of writings promulgating the teaching of the faith, along with books consisting solely of writings sacred to a religious faith, under Tex. Tax Code Ann. § 151.312. Prior to October 2, 1984, Texas also exempted magazine subscriptions running half a year or longer and entered as second class mail. That general exemption was repealed effective October 2, 1984, and remained repealed until October 1, 1987. During the three-year interval, Texas Monthly, Inc., which publishes a monthly general interest magazine not limited to religious teachings, was required to collect and remit sales taxes on its qualifying subscription sales.
Texas Monthly paid $149,107.74 in sales taxes under protest in 1985 and filed suit in the District Court of Travis County, Texas, seeking a refund of those payments. The district court ruled that the religious periodicals exemption had no basis other than the promotion of religion itself. The court also found that the exemption discriminated on the basis of publication content. It declared the tax unconstitutional as applied to nonreligious periodicals and ordered the State to refund the amount paid plus interest.
The Court of Appeals, Third Supreme Judicial District of Texas, reversed the district court's judgment by a 2-to-1 vote. The Court of Appeals applied the tripartite test from Lemon v. Kurtzman. It concluded that the exemption served a secular purpose of preserving separation between church and state, did not have the primary effect of advancing or inhibiting religion, and did not produce impermissible government entanglement with religion. Therefore the Court of Appeals upheld the exemption.
The United States Supreme Court noted probable jurisdiction to consider the constitutionality of the exemption.
View case