Also known as:surveillances · surveil · surveils · surveilled · surveilling · electronic surveillance · wiretap
Written by attorneys — see sources below.
An act of monitoring or observing a person, place, or activity, often covertly or through electronic means. Under the Fourth Amendment, such monitoring constitutes a search when it intrudes on a reasonable expectation of privacy.
See Our Sources
How its tested
Common Examples
2
Hidden Device in Capitol Lounge
Scott Summers regularly met a lobbyist in a credentialed lounge separated from the corridor by a decorative screen. State investigators installed a concealed audio recorder under the table without a warrant. The court holds that the recording intruded on a reasonable expectation of privacy and therefore required judicial approval before use.
Defective Wiretap Application
Sean Steele was suspected of bribery. Officers obtained a wiretap order that named Steele but failed to describe the specific conversations to be intercepted or set a termination date. The court suppresses the recordings because the warrant lacked the required particularity and procedural limits.
Put it into practice
Test Yourself
10
Practice Questions5
· 9 primary sources
Cases
Model Codes
4 common questions
Students Frequently Ask...
When does electronic surveillance require a warrant under the Fourth Amendment?
Electronic surveillance requires a warrant when it intrudes on a reasonable expectation of privacy. No warrant is needed for conversations exposed to the public or where the speaker makes no effort to keep them private.
Supporting sources
What particularity requirements apply to a valid wiretap warrant?
A valid wiretap warrant must identify the suspected persons, describe the conversations to be intercepted, establish probable cause for a specific crime, limit the duration, and require a prompt return to the court detailing the interceptions.
Supporting sources
Does a semi-private lounge create a reasonable expectation of privacy against surveillance?
A lounge accessible only to credentialed personnel and separated by a screen can support a reasonable expectation of privacy. The court weighs access limits and visual barriers against the possibility that many credentialed individuals could still enter.
Supporting sources
How does the Model Penal Code define a private place for surveillance purposes?
A private place is one where a person may reasonably expect to be safe from casual or hostile intrusion or surveillance. It excludes areas open to the public or a substantial group of people.
Supporting sources
TortsNegligence · Problems relating to proof of fault, including res ipsa loquiturUBEIntermediate