A category of licensee who enters or remains on land solely by virtue of the possessor's consent and for purposes of companionship, diversion, or entertainment rather than any business purpose of the possessor.
See Our Sources
How its tested
Common Examples
6
License Terminable at Will
Sarah Sullivan invited Scott Summers to her cabin for the weekend to enjoy fishing together. After an argument on Saturday morning, Sarah told Scott he must leave immediately. Scott packed and departed without protest because the consent-based privilege ended at Sarah's direction.
Consent Creates Licensee Status
Selena Singh permitted her neighbor Stephen Shaw to enter her backyard to view her new garden. Stephen walked through the gate solely for personal enjoyment. Because entry rested only on Selena's permission, Stephen qualified as a licensee rather than an invitee.
Seth Shapiro hosted Sean Steele for an evening social visit at his lake house. When Seth asked Sean to leave after an unexpected family emergency arose, Seth allowed Sean thirty minutes to gather his belongings and drive away safely.
Child Licensee Liability Standard
Sierra Solutions permitted the young child of employee Sarah Sullivan to accompany her to the company picnic on its grounds. When the child tripped over an unmarked cable, the company faced the same duty it would owe a trespassing child because the social-guest child held licensee status.
Reliance on Duration Representation
Southland Foods told visiting friend Selena Singh she could use the company break room for study sessions through the end of the month. Relying on that statement, Selena purchased a new laptop and printer for her work there. When the company later tried to revoke access mid-month, Selena retained the privilege long enough to recover her equipment costs.
Known Hazard to Social Guest
Scott Summers invited his friend Stephen Shaw to his apartment for dinner. Scott knew the bathroom faucet handle was cracked but said nothing. When the handle broke and injured Stephen's hand, Stephen's status as a social guest required the host to warn of the known dangerous condition.
Nancy Christian was the tenant of an apartment whose lessors had been notified by her on November 1, 1963, that the knob of the cold water faucet on the bathroom basin was cracked and should be replaced. On November 30, 1963, plaintiff Rowland entered the apartment at Christian's invitation as a social guest and was injured while using the bathroom fixtures when the porcelain handle of one of the water faucets broke in his hand.
The injury severed the tendons and medial nerve in Rowland's right hand. He incurred medical and hospital expenses, suffered loss of wages, and sustained damage to his clothing. Rowland later filed a complaint alleging that the bathroom fixtures were dangerous, that Christian was aware of the dangerous condition, and that his injuries were proximately caused by her negligence.
Christian filed an answer containing a general denial except that she admitted telling the lessors the faucet was defective and should be replaced. She also alleged contributory negligence and assumption of the risk on the ground that Rowland had failed to use his eyesight and knew of the condition of the premises. Christian supported her motion for summary judgment with an affidavit stating that Rowland was a social guest who had used the bathroom on a prior occasion and that the handle broke while he was using the faucet.
In opposition, Rowland filed an affidavit stating that immediately prior to the accident he told Christian he was going to use the bathroom facilities, that she had known for two weeks that the faucet handle was cracked, that she had warned the manager of the building of the condition but nothing was done to repair it, that she did not warn him of the condition, and that the handle broke when he turned off the faucet. The trial court granted summary judgment for Christian, and Rowland appealed.
What duty does a host owe a social guest regarding known dangers?
A host must warn a social guest of known dangerous conditions that the guest is unlikely to discover. The guest generally takes the premises as found but receives protection against concealed hazards the host actually knows about.
Supporting sources
How does a social guest differ from an invitee?
An invitee enters for a purpose connected with the possessor's business. A social guest enters solely for personal social reasons and therefore receives only licensee-level protection rather than the higher invitee duty of reasonable care.
Can a social guest's license be revoked immediately?
A social guest's license is generally terminable at the will of the possessor, but the guest must receive a reasonable opportunity to remove personal effects before departure.
Supporting sources
326 U.S. at 101, 110–11
…accident occurred through negligence in the operation, or maintenance, of the train; that he was rightfully on the premises as licensee because on a commonly used beaten footpath which ran for a short distance alongside the tracks; and that he was struck by something which looked like a door projecting from one of the…
Business Associations Corporations and LlcsOrganizational structure including relationships between parents and subsidiaries · Mergers and consolidationsUBEIntermediate