Also known as:servitudes on land · land servitude · land servitudes · easement · real servitude
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A nonpossessory burden or encumbrance on land that limits the possessor's use or enjoyment or confers a use right on another. The burden arises from an affirmative or negative easement or a restrictive covenant.
Sources & Authorities· 9 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Restatements
Casebooks
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Affirmative Easement Use Right
Stephen Shaw owns a landlocked parcel and obtains an easement across Sebastian Santos's adjacent field to reach the public road. Stephen drives farm equipment over the field each season. The easement entitles Stephen to perform acts on Sebastian's land that would otherwise constitute trespass.
Nonpossessory Entry Right
Sierra Solutions holds an easement allowing its crews to enter Solomon Silver's commercial lot to inspect utility lines. Sierra's workers regularly access the lot with equipment. The easement creates a nonpossessory right that obligates Solomon not to block the authorized entries.
Chain Of Title Notice Failure
Seth Shapiro buys a rural tract from a seller whose deed makes no mention of any easement. An earlier deed from the common grantor to a stranger recorded an access easement across the tract. Because the easement lies outside Seth's chain of title, he takes the land free of constructive notice of the burden.
Appurtenant Easement Benefit
Sophia Singh owns a lakeside cottage benefited by an easement across Sean Steele's neighboring shoreline lot for boat access. The easement was created to serve Sophia's parcel and continues to benefit its use. The burden therefore runs with Sean’s land as the servient tenement.
Irrevocable License As Easement
Starlight Media receives an irrevocable license to maintain a transmission tower on Spectrum Financial's rooftop. The license permits ongoing entry and use that would otherwise be trespass. Under the applicable classification the license functions as an easement rather than a mere revocable permission.
Permit Condition Taking Analysis
Sentinel Security applies for a building permit to expand its facility. The city grants the permit only if Sentinel conveys a public access easement across its parking lot. The condition constitutes a taking unless an essential nexus exists between the easement demand and impacts caused by the proposed expansion.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
How does an affirmative easement differ from a negative easement under the Restatement classifications?+
An affirmative easement permits the holder to perform acts on the servient land that would otherwise be trespass. A negative easement instead prevents the servient owner from performing acts that would otherwise be privileged. The Restatement (Third) treats negative easements as restrictive covenants.
Supporting sources
When is the benefit of an easement appurtenant rather than in gross?+
The benefit is appurtenant when the easement is created to benefit and does benefit the possessor of a particular parcel in the use of that parcel. The burden of every easement is always appurtenant to the servient land.
Supporting sources
Does a recorded easement outside the purchaser's chain of title provide constructive notice?+
No. Under the chain of title doctrine a purchaser receives constructive notice only of instruments appearing in the chain through which title is claimed. An easement recorded in a stranger's chain is outside the chain and does not bind a subsequent purchaser.
Supporting sources
What standard must a government exaction satisfy to avoid constituting a taking when it requires conveyance of an easement?+
The condition must bear an essential nexus to a legitimate governmental interest that would justify denial of the permit outright. The exaction must also be roughly proportional to the impacts caused by the proposed development.
Supporting sources
How are duties to repair and maintain an easement allocated between the parties?+
The beneficiary must repair and maintain portions under its control to avoid unreasonable interference with the servient estate or third-party liability. The servient owner has no affirmative duty to repair unless the parties jointly use the improvement, in which case contribution to reasonable costs is required.
Supporting sources
to pass across their beachfront lot. The Nollans filed a petition for writ of administrative mandamus in the Superior Court of California, alleging that the condition violated the Takings…
easement
for light only after twenty years of uninterrupted enjoyment of the light. The doctrine of ancient lights was never adopted in this state. Doherty v. Allman , 17 Wis. 638 (1863). The…
Real PropertyRights in real property · Restrictive covenantsUBEFoundational