Also known as:servient lands · servient tenement · servient estate
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Land burdened by an easement. The possessor of such land must allow the easement holder to exercise the rights granted by the servitude.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Easement Burdens Adjacent Parcel
Serena Soto owns a parcel crossed by a recorded right of way allowing Sean Steele to reach his inland lot. When Steele drives across the path daily, Soto cannot block the route because her land is subject to the easement. The servient status limits her ability to exclude Steele from the defined strip.
Repair Duty on Burdened Land
Skyline Construction holds an easement for a pipeline across Steven Silva's acreage. Silva must refrain from damaging the line, yet the company bears the duty to maintain the pipe and prevent leaks that could harm Silva's soil. The servient estate carries no affirmative repair obligation unless joint use arises.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Restatements
Hornbooks
Sydney Santos conveys a strip to Samantha Stone while retaining an access easement over the remainder. Before the deed, Santos used the strip only for foot traffic. The prior pattern on the servient land informs the scope of the easement retained after conveyance.
Servient Owner Retains Use
Silverline Industries owns land crossed by Sabrina Shah's recorded driveway easement. Industries may plant crops or park vehicles on the burdened area so long as those activities leave Shah's passage reasonably unobstructed. The servient status permits all uses that avoid unreasonable interference.
Post-Conveyance Conduct
Southland Foods grants an easement across its loading area to Sierra Solutions. After the grant, Southland Foods begins storing pallets on the path each afternoon. The later storage on the servient land helps determine whether the new activity exceeds the easement's scope.
Expanded Use Exceeds Servient Burden
The Browns own a parcel benefited by an access easement over the Voss land. After acquiring an adjacent lot, the Browns route all traffic to the new parcel across the Voss path. The servient estate is not required to absorb the added burden from the nondominant parcel.
Brown v. Voss38 Wash. App. 777, 689 P.2d 1111 (1984)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
What distinguishes servient land from dominant land?+
Servient land is the parcel subject to the easement and must accommodate the easement holder's limited use. Dominant land is the parcel benefited by the easement. The distinction determines which owner holds the burden and which holds the benefit.
Supporting sources
May the owner of servient land make any use of the burdened area?+
The owner may use the servient land in any manner that does not unreasonably interfere with the easement. Uses that block or substantially impair the easement rights are prohibited.
Supporting sources
Who bears the duty to repair improvements on servient land?+
The easement beneficiary must repair and maintain portions under its control to avoid unreasonable interference or third-party liability. The servient owner has no duty to repair unless the parties share the improvement.
Supporting sources
How does prior use of servient land affect easement scope?+
Courts consider the use made of the servient land before conveyance when determining the easement's extent. That historical pattern supplies evidence of the parties' intent at the time of the grant.
Supporting sources
Does later use of servient land limit the easement?+
Post-conveyance conduct on the servient land is relevant to interpreting whether a new activity exceeds the easement's scope. Courts weigh that conduct along with the original grant language.
Supporting sources
38 Wash. App. 777, 689 P.2d 1111 (1984)Property
…Reed, J.; Petrich, C.J., and Petrie, J., concur Opinion of Reed, J. Defendants, Fred and Hattie Voss, owners of the servient estate, appeal from a judgment that denied their counterclaim for an injunction against Will and Jean Brown, plaintiffs, owners of the dominant estate. Defendants requested the injunction to…