Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A presumption that shifts the burden of production or persuasion to the opposing party but yields upon the introduction of contrary evidence sufficient to meet the applicable standard.
Sources & Authorities· 8 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Uniform Acts
Restatements
Casebooks
Hornbooks
Course Outlines
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Enemy Combatant Review Panel
Rita Russell, a U.S. citizen detained at a domestic military facility, faces an internal panel that relies on hearsay summaries and places the burden on her to disprove enemy-combatant status. She presents live testimony and documents showing she had no contact with the alleged group. The panel credits her evidence and orders her release because the presumption favoring the government has been overcome.
Sham Will Executed for Leverage
Roberto Reyes signs a document reciting that it is his last will and leaves his estate to his girlfriend. After his death his daughter introduces voicemails in which he states the document was created only to pressure a business associate. The court finds the extrinsic evidence sufficient to rebut the presumption of testamentary intent and refuses probate.
Lateral Lawyer Screening Measures
Rina Rahman joins Ridgeway Partners after previously representing a client adverse to one of the firm's current matters. The firm implements an ethical wall that prevents her access to files and excludes her from fee sharing. The court accepts the evidence as rebutting the presumption of shared confidences and denies disqualification.
Sanity Presumption in Criminal Trial
Ronald Reed is charged with murder and offers evidence of long-term mental illness. The prosecution rests on the initial presumption of sanity. Reed's expert testimony and hospital records persuade the jury that he lacked capacity, overcoming the presumption and resulting in an acquittal by reason of insanity.
Davis v. United States160 U.S. 469, 16 S.Ct. 353, 40 L.Ed. 499 (1895)
Pattern-or-Practice Discrimination Claim
Ryan Roberts, an African-American applicant, shows that Reliance Insurance systematically rejected minority candidates for entry-level positions. The statistical evidence creates a presumption of discriminatory motive. The company fails to articulate a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for the pattern, so the presumption stands and liability is established.
International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States431 U.S. 324, 335 n.15 (1977)
Capital Sentencing Racial Bias Study
Renee Rogers is sentenced to death in a jurisdiction where a comprehensive study shows race influences capital outcomes. She offers the study to rebut the presumption that the sentencing process is free of improper bias. The court finds the statistical evidence insufficient to overcome the presumption and upholds the sentence.
McCleskey v. Kemp481 U.S. 279 (1987)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
How does a rebuttable presumption differ from a conclusive presumption?+
A rebuttable presumption yields when contrary evidence is introduced that meets the applicable burden, whereas a conclusive presumption cannot be overcome by any evidence. Primary authorities illustrate that rebuttable presumptions merely shift burdens temporarily and permit rebuttal through proof such as extrinsic evidence or screening measures.
What evidence suffices to rebut the presumption of testamentary intent?+
Extrinsic evidence showing the document served a collateral non-testamentary purpose overcomes the presumption. Courts admit voicemails or other proof that the instrument was never intended to operate as a will.
When does a lateral lawyer's prior representation trigger a rebuttable presumption of shared confidences?
+
The presumption arises when the lawyer previously represented a client in a substantially related matter. The new firm may rebut it by proving timely and effective screening that prevents any involvement or fee sharing.
How do military exigencies affect rebuttable presumptions in enemy-combatant proceedings?+
Due process permits relaxed evidentiary rules and government-favorable rebuttable presumptions, yet the government must still afford a meaningful opportunity before a neutral decisionmaker to contest the factual basis for detention.
What role does a rebuttable presumption play in employment discrimination pattern-or-practice cases?+
Statistical evidence of a discriminatory pattern creates a presumption that shifts the burden to the employer to articulate a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason. Failure to do so leaves the presumption unrebutted and supports liability.
in favor of individual relief is consistent with the manner in which
presumptions
are created generally.
Presumptions
shifting the burden of proof are often created to reflect judicial…
Constitutional LawThe separation of powers · The powers of the presidentUBEIntermediate