Also known as:race-notice statute · race notice recording statute · race-notice recording act · race-notice act · race notice statute
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A statutory rule that awards priority to a subsequent purchaser over a prior unrecorded interest only when the purchaser acquires for value without notice and records first.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Forged Deed Chain Breaks Title
Rosa Ruiz owns Blackacre. Her accountant forges a deed conveying the mineral rights to Robert Rivera, who pays value and records. Rivera then conveys the rights to Raven Logistics, which pays value, conducts a clean title search, and records first under the jurisdiction's race-notice statute. When Rosa sues to quiet title, the forged deed conveys nothing, so Raven acquires no interest despite satisfying the statute's notice and race requirements.
Notice Defeats First Recorder
Ricardo Rojas conveys a parcel to Riley Rivera by unrecorded deed. Rojas later conveys the same parcel to Rowan Russell, who knows of the prior deed at the time of purchase. Rowan records first. Riley then records and sues to quiet title. Because Rowan had actual notice when taking the deed, the race-notice statute does not protect Rowan and Riley's earlier interest prevails.
Put it into practice
Test Yourself
8
Practice Questions5
· 2 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Common Law
Course Outlines
Study Supplements
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
What two requirements must a subsequent purchaser satisfy to prevail under a race-notice recording statute?+
The purchaser must take for value without actual, record, or inquiry notice of the prior unrecorded interest and must record before the earlier grantee. Both elements are required. Recording first alone is insufficient if notice existed at acquisition.
Supporting sources
How does open possession by a prior grantee affect a later purchaser's status under a race-notice statute?+
Visible, exclusive possession inconsistent with the record owner's title places the later purchaser on inquiry notice. Inquiry notice defeats bona fide purchaser status even if the purchaser records first, allowing the prior unrecorded interest to prevail.
Supporting sources
Does a race-notice statute protect a purchaser who takes under a forged deed?+
No. A forged deed is void and conveys no title. Recording acts resolve priority only among valid instruments tracing to a common grantor. They cannot validate a forgery or protect subsequent purchasers in that chain.
Supporting sources
What happens when the first recorder had notice of the prior deed at the time of purchase?+
The prior unrecorded interest prevails. Notice at acquisition prevents the recorder from qualifying as a bona fide purchaser, so the race element cannot overcome the notice defect under the statute.
Supporting sources
Real PropertyTitles · Recording actsNEXTGENIntermediate