Also known as: quid pro quo claim · quid-pro-quo claims · quid pro quo
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An allegation that one party conditioned a benefit, opportunity, or official action on the recipient's provision of a specific favor or return performance. The claim requires proof of a direct reciprocal exchange rather than mere influence or access.
Queenie Quinones, a sitting judge, attends a private social event hosted by a recently convicted racketeer who invites numerous guests with organized-crime ties. A disciplinary complaint alleges that the attendance itself creates an appearance of impropriety.
Quade Quincy, owner of a coal company, sues federal officials after being assessed liability for retiree health benefits under a statute that retroactively imposes costs on prior operators. He argues the statute effects a taking by forcing an exchange of payments for no corresponding new benefit. The court examines whether the mandated payments constitute an unconstitutional quid pro quo.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Quiana Quach faces jail for nonpayment of child support after a hearing conducted without appointed counsel. She claims the state's refusal to provide counsel creates an unconstitutional exchange in which her liberty is traded for an uncounseled finding of willful nonpayment. The Court evaluates whether due process requires counsel when incarceration is at stake.
Quest Quail applies for a permit to rebuild a beachfront home. The commission grants the permit only if Quail records a public-access easement across the property. Quail claims the condition is an unconstitutional exaction amounting to a taking because it demands an easement in exchange for the development right.
Quinn Quigley, a bank employee, alleges that her supervisor conditioned job retention and promotions on her submission to sexual demands. She files a Title VII claim asserting that the supervisor's conduct created a quid pro quo arrangement in which continued employment was traded for sexual compliance.
Quentin Quinn, a publisher of public-domain works, challenges a statute that extends existing copyright terms by twenty years. He contends the extension functions as an improper exchange in which Congress grants additional monopoly protection without any new creative contribution from authors.
The plaintiff must show that a tangible job benefit or detriment was conditioned on submission to sexual conduct. The exchange must be explicit or implicit and tied directly to an employment decision.
No. At common law the agreement itself completes the conspiracy. Proof that the parties reached a mutual understanding to exchange official action for campaign contributions is sufficient even if no money changes hands.
Yes. Discipline may be imposed when associations undermine public confidence in judicial integrity even without proof that any actual exchange occurred.
The condition must bear an essential nexus and rough proportionality to the impact of the proposed development. An unrelated easement demand is treated as an exaction that requires compensation.
…review of the police power, this provision is eminently reasonable. Even accepting the Court's novel insistence on a precise quid pro quo of burdens and benefits, there is a reasonable relationship between the public benefit and the burden created by appellants' development. The movement of development closer to the ocean…