Also known as: procedural fence · forum shopping · procedural manipulation
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A strategic tactic in which a party files a declaratory judgment action primarily to secure a procedural advantage such as preempting parallel litigation or racing for res judicata. Courts weigh this factor when deciding whether to exercise discretion to grant declaratory relief in the presence of a pending state proceeding.
Pinnacle Holdings, an insurer, learns that its insured, Paul Peterson, plans to sue in state court for bad-faith denial of a claim. Pinnacle files a declaratory judgment action in federal court the next day seeking a ruling that the policy excludes coverage. The federal court declines to entertain the action because the filing was timed to preempt the state suit and obtain a res judicata advantage.
Prosperity Investments faces a state-court coverage suit brought by Phoebe Park. It immediately files a federal declaratory judgment action on the same policy issues. The federal court dismisses the declaratory action after finding that the filing was intended as procedural fencing to race for a favorable judgment and to provide another forum.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Courts examine the timing of the federal filing relative to the state action, whether the declaratory plaintiff seeks to preempt the state suit, and whether the action is a race for res judicata. The presence of these indicators weighs against exercising jurisdiction over the declaratory claim.
Supporting sources
No. Courts require evidence that the declaratory filing was motivated by a desire to gain a procedural edge rather than by legitimate uncertainty about coverage. Mere overlap in parties and issues is insufficient without signs of a race to judgment.
Supporting sources