Also known as: positive proofs · direct evidence
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
Direct or affirmative evidence that establishes a fact without requiring inference from other facts or circumstances.
Testator Piper Patel's will left her ranch to cousin John. After execution, extrinsic evidence showed she had no cousin named John but had a nephew named John and a cousin named James. The court refused to treat the discrepancy as creating an ambiguity because the only evidence of contrary intention was direct testimony from the drafting attorney that Patel had instructed the lawyer to name James.
Settlor Perry Pratt executed a trust stating that income would go to his daughter for life. Clear and convincing evidence from the drafting files and Pratt's own letters proved he had intended the income to go to his son instead because of a typist's error. The court reformed the document to match that proven intention.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Shareholder Preston Pratt bought Basic Inc. stock after the company made misleading statements about merger talks. Pratt offered no direct testimony that he had read or relied on the statements. The court still found the required causal link because the statements were public and material.
Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. sued Arlington Heights after the village denied a rezoning request for low-income housing. The developer presented minutes and statements from board members showing racial motivation. The court required that evidence to prove discriminatory purpose under equal protection.
Officers executed a warrant later found defective. The prosecution introduced the officers' testimony that they had relied in good faith on the warrant's facial validity. The court upheld admission of the seized evidence because that affirmative showing satisfied the good-faith exception.
Plaintiffs alleged that telecom companies had agreed to restrain competition. Their complaint contained only parallel pricing behavior without any direct evidence of an actual agreement. The court dismissed the action because parallel conduct alone did not plausibly suggest conspiracy.
Positive proof directly establishes the existence of a fact. Negative proof establishes a fact by showing that its opposite is not or cannot be true.
Direct evidence of intention that contradicts the plain meaning of the text does not create an ambiguity under the Restatement rule. Such evidence may still support reformation under a clear-and-convincing standard.
Clear and convincing evidence must show both that a mistake affected specific terms and what the donor's actual intention was. Direct evidence of intention may be considered in that inquiry.
Yes. The prosecution must prove each element beyond a reasonable doubt with affirmative evidence. The mere presence of contraband on a ship captained by the defendant supplies no such proof of knowledge.
…application of the Confrontation Clause to unsworn testimonial statements a moot point, that would merely change our focus from direct evidence of original meaning of the Sixth Amendment to reasonable inference. We find it implausible that a provision which concededly condemned trial by sworn ex parte affidavit thought trial by…