Also known as: Miranda rights to counsel · Miranda counsel right · right to counsel Miranda
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A Fifth Amendment protection that attaches when a suspect in custody unambiguously requests the assistance of counsel during custodial interrogation. The invocation bars police from reinitiating questioning about any offense until counsel is present or the suspect reopens dialogue and validly waives the right.
Matthew Martinez was arrested for mortgage fraud and told officers he wanted his lawyer. Three hours later, while still in custody, Detective Ruiz entered the holding cell, gave fresh warnings, and asked about other property deals. Martinez made incriminating statements. The court suppressed the statements because police reinitiated custodial interrogation after the clear invocation.
Miranda Morales was detained at the precinct on drug charges. After warnings, she said, "Maybe I should talk to a lawyer." Officers continued questioning without clarification and she made statements. The court admitted the statements because the remark was not a clear request that a reasonable officer would understand as invoking counsel.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Musa Mensah was arrested for smuggling and invoked his right to counsel during the shipboard interview. Questioning stopped. The next day agents brought him to the port authority office and restarted questioning without counsel present. Mensah confessed. The court suppressed the confession because police reinitiated custodial interrogation after the clear request for counsel.
Melissa Mills was arrested for laundering client funds and invoked her right to counsel. She briefly met with an attorney that evening. The next morning a detective returned alone to her cell and questioned her about insurance claims without counsel present. Mills made statements. The court suppressed them because the right requires counsel's presence at subsequent interrogation unless the suspect reinitiates.
Yes. Once a suspect in custody clearly invokes the right, police may not initiate further custodial interrogation about any offense, even a completely unrelated crime, unless the suspect initiates or counsel is present.
Supporting sources
A suspect must articulate the desire for counsel sufficiently clearly that a reasonable officer would understand it as such. Ambiguous statements such as "Maybe I should talk to a lawyer" do not require officers to stop questioning.
Supporting sources
No. Once the right is invoked, police may not reinitiate custodial interrogation in the absence of counsel even if the suspect has previously consulted with an attorney. The right requires counsel's presence at subsequent interrogation unless the suspect reinitiates and waives.
Supporting sources
Police must cease interrogation after a clear invocation. They may resume only if counsel is provided or the suspect himself initiates further communication and then validly waives the right.
Supporting sources