/MEN-tuhl dih-ZEEZ or dih-FEKT ek-SKLOO-ding ri-SPON-suh-bil-uh-tee/·principle
Also known as:mental disease or defect · mental disease · mental defect · insanity defense · lack of criminal responsibility
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
An affirmative defense to criminal liability that excuses a defendant from responsibility for conduct when, as a result of mental disease or defect, the defendant lacked substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality or wrongfulness of the conduct or to conform the conduct to the requirements of law. The defense does not encompass an abnormality manifested only by repeated criminal or antisocial conduct.
Sources & Authorities· 15 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Federal Rules
Model Codes
Common Law
Casebooks
Study Supplements
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Durham Product Test Application
Maurice Marshall, diagnosed with severe schizophrenia, deliberately set fire to a vacant warehouse after weeks of delusional beliefs that the building housed government surveillance equipment. Medical records confirmed that the delusions directly drove the arson. The court acquitted Marshall because the offense would not have occurred but for his mental disease.
Post-Miranda Silence Barred
Mariam Mansour remained silent after receiving Miranda warnings when asked about prior mental health treatment. At trial she raised an insanity defense based on bipolar disorder. The prosecutor attempted to use her silence to argue the defense was fabricated, but the court sustained the objection and barred the argument.
Sentencing Mitigation Evidence
Miranda Morales faced capital murder charges after killing her roommate during a psychotic episode. Her defense introduced expert testimony that bipolar disorder substantially impaired her capacity to appreciate wrongfulness. The jury considered the evidence and imposed life imprisonment rather than death.
Late Insanity Notice Denied
Meredith Maxwell was indicted for embezzlement and waited until after discovery closed to file written notice of an insanity defense. She cited recent hospitalization but offered no explanation why the records could not have been obtained earlier. The court denied leave to file late and precluded the defense at trial.
Mandatory Commitment Order
Musa Mensah was acquitted of assault after proving that schizophrenia caused him to attack a stranger he believed was an alien. The court immediately ordered commitment to a state mental health facility for custody, care, and treatment rather than release.
State-Funded Psychiatric Assistance
Michelle Murphy, an indigent defendant charged with murder, made a preliminary showing that she would rely on an insanity defense. The court ordered the state to provide access to a psychiatrist to assist in preparing the defense and to testify at sentencing regarding future dangerousness.
Ake v. Oklahoma470 U.S. 68 (1985)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
What must a defendant show to establish the defense under the Model Penal Code formulation?+
The defendant must prove that at the time of the conduct, as a result of mental disease or defect, the defendant lacked substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality or wrongfulness of the conduct or to conform the conduct to the requirements of law. The defense excludes abnormalities shown only by repeated criminal or antisocial conduct.
Supporting sources
When must a defendant provide notice of an insanity defense in federal court?+
A defendant must notify the government in writing within the time for filing pretrial motions or at a later time set by the court. Failure to provide timely notice bars reliance on the defense unless the court finds good cause for a late filing.
Supporting sources
What happens after an acquittal on grounds of mental disease or defect under the Model Penal Code?+
The court must order the defendant committed to the custody of the Commissioner of Mental Hygiene for placement in an appropriate institution for custody, care, and treatment. Release requires a later judicial determination that the person poses no danger to self or others.
Supporting sources
May the prosecution use a defendant's post-Miranda silence to rebut an insanity defense?+
No. Once Miranda warnings are given, the government implicitly assures the suspect that silence carries no penalty. Using post-warning silence as evidence to undermine an insanity claim violates due process.
Supporting sources
Is evidence of impaired capacity due to mental disease or defect admissible at sentencing in capital cases?+
Yes. When a jury or court may recommend death or imprisonment, evidence that mental disease or defect impaired the defendant's capacity to appreciate wrongfulness or conform conduct to law is admissible in favor of a sentence of imprisonment.
Supporting sources
, his intellectual power is for the time obliterated, he is not a responsible moral agent, and is not punishable for
criminal
acts." Commonwealth v. Rogers, 7 Met. (Mass.) 500. Neither in…
excluding
criminal
responsibility
" as a
defense
. That
defense
required evidence that defendant was "unable either to appreciate the
criminal
ity of his conduct or to conform his conduct to…
defense
adequately, the attorney stated, a psychiatrist would have to examine Ake with respect to his
mental
condition at the time of the…
ContractsDefenses to enforceability · Incapacity to contractUBEFoundational