Also known as: loci in quo · place where · scene of the event
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
The place where an event, condition, or item is located or alleged to have occurred. In property disputes this identifies the land or premises on which a chattel is found, determining whether the finder or the owner of that place holds superior possessory rights against all but the true owner.
Leonard Lowe owned a vacant lot containing an unfenced excavation. A neighborhood child entered the lot and fell into the hole. The court examined whether the locus in quo was a place where Lowe knew or had reason to know children were likely to trespass, which determined whether he owed a duty to the child.
Lance Lee sued Lumen Capital in state court located in the county where the contract was performed. Lumen Capital removed the case to the federal district court embracing that same county. The removal statute directed the case to the district and division that included the locus in quo of the pending action.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Luis Lopez was charged with theft at a warehouse. His attorney served notice listing three specific addresses where Lopez claimed to have been during the hours of the offense. Each listed address constituted a distinct locus in quo that the government could investigate to test the alibi.
Lillian Locke executed her will in a foreign country while maintaining a residence there. After her death in another state, the probate court applied the law of the place of execution because the statute validated a will executed in compliance with the law of the locus in quo at the time of signing.
Levi Lowe operated a chemical storage facility in a residential neighborhood. When a spill injured neighboring property, the court weighed the inappropriateness of the activity to the locus in quo as one factor in deciding whether the operation constituted an abnormally dangerous activity.
Lucy Liu obtained a judgment in state court. The opposing party sought review in federal court. The federal court examined whether it had authority over the state proceeding that arose in the locus in quo, determining the scope of its appellate jurisdiction.
When an item is mislaid, the owner of the locus in quo holds superior possessory rights against all but the true owner. Courts award the item to the possessor of the premises rather than the finder because the premises owner is better positioned to return the item to its owner.
Supporting sources
No. A trespasser who finds property on another's land acquires no rights superior to the owner of the locus in quo. The owner of the premises prevails because rewarding trespass would encourage unlawful entry.
Supporting sources
The owner of the locus in quo becomes a bailee for the true owner when property is intentionally placed on the premises and then forgotten. This classification gives the premises owner the duty to safeguard the item until the true owner reclaims it.
Supporting sources
…legally in Texas and, consequently, the prospect of obtaining an illegal abortion there or of going outside Texas to some place where the procedure could be obtained legally and competently. We thus have as plaintiffs a married couple who have, as their asserted immediate and present injury, only an alleged "detrimental…