Also known as: judicial foreclosures
Written by attorneys — see sources below.
A foreclosure method by which the mortgaged property is sold through a court proceeding requiring the filing of a complaint, service of process, notice, and a hearing. The mortgagee initiates the action to terminate the mortgagor's equity of redemption and realize on the collateral by court-supervised sale. The mortgage instrument and applicable state statute determine whether this method is available and control the required procedures for notice, sale, and redemption.
Justin Jarvis borrowed from Juarez Holdings and granted a mortgage on his warehouse. After Jarvis missed several payments, Juarez Holdings filed a complaint in state court, served process on Jarvis and all junior lienholders, and obtained a judgment ordering a public sale. The court-supervised auction produced proceeds that satisfied the debt and left a small surplus returned to Jarvis.
Jason Jung sold land to Joanna Jung under an installment contract containing a forfeiture clause. When Joanna missed payments, Jason sought to terminate her interest immediately. The court recharacterized the contract as a mortgage and required Jason to proceed by judicial foreclosure, ordering a public sale that allowed Joanna an opportunity to redeem and receive any surplus.
In December of 1958, Mary Burkowski, as vendor, entered into a land sale contract with Charles P. Marshall and Agnes P. Marshall, as vendees, for the sale of the real estate for the sum of $36,000.00. The contract required an initial payment of $500.00 at signing, another $500.00 on or before December 25, 1958, and then $2,500.00 or more on or before January 15 of each year starting in 1960 until the balance was paid in full, all without interest. The contract also included a prepayment clause stating that any prepayments made by the vendees would be applied in lieu of further principal payments required under the contract to the extent of such prepayments only. It further contained a forfeiture provision stating that if any default in payment continued for 30 days, all moneys and payments previously paid would, at the option of the vendor without notice or demand, be forfeited and retained as liquidated damages, after which the contract would terminate. Mary Burkowski died in 1963. The plaintiffs in this action are the assignees of the decedent's interests in the contract under her will, and they received their assignment from the executrix of the estate on June 27, 1968. One year after this assignment, several of the assignees filed their complaint alleging that the defendants had defaulted through non-payment and seeking to enforce the forfeiture clause to obtain possession of the real estate. The schedule of payments made under the contract showed a total of $21,000.00 paid by February 15, 1965, with specific payments including $500.00 on December 1, 1958, $500.00 on December 25, 1958, $5,000.00 on March 26, 1959, and subsequent $2,500.00 payments through February 15, 1965. No payments have been made since that last date, leaving $15,000.00 unpaid on the original contract price. In response to the plaintiffs' attempt to enforce the forfeiture provision, the defendants raised the affirmative defense of waiver based on the acceptance of overdue or irregular payments. The trial court entered a negative judgment against the plaintiff-respondents. The Court of Appeals reversed that judgment, holding that the defendants had breached the contract and that the plaintiffs had not waived their right to enforce the forfeiture provisions. The petitioners then sought transfer to the Indiana Supreme Court from the adverse ruling by the Court of Appeals.
The lender files a complaint, serves process on the mortgagor and all junior interest holders, obtains a judicial hearing, and secures a decree ordering a public sale with proper notice and advertising. The court oversees title search, determines lien priorities, and distributes sale proceeds according to priority.
Supporting sources
Judicial foreclosure requires a lawsuit and court supervision, providing full procedural safeguards including the opportunity to raise defenses before sale. Nonjudicial foreclosure proceeds under a power-of-sale clause without court involvement and is typically faster but offers fewer pre-sale protections to the borrower.
Supporting sources
Yes, when the mortgage and state statute authorize multiple foreclosure types, the lender may elect different methods for different parcels securing the same debt. The choice of method affects only the procedures for notice, sale, and redemption rights applicable to each parcel.
Supporting sources
In most jurisdictions judicial foreclosure culminates in a court-supervised public sale, but a few states permit strict foreclosure in which the court simply terminates the equity of redemption without a sale. The mortgage and statute control whether a sale is required.
Supporting sources