Also known as: insufficient process · defective process
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A ground for dismissal when the summons itself fails to meet the formal requirements for its content.
Ivan Ivanov filed suit in federal court in State A against Indigo Textiles. The summons named the court in State B and referred to the defendant only by its trade name. Indigo Textiles moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(4) because the summons did not satisfy the naming requirements on its face.
Isabella Ingram sued Icarus Aviation in federal court. The summons omitted any statement of the time within which the defendant had to appear. Icarus Aviation moved to dismiss for insufficiency of process even though its counsel received a cover letter stating the deadline.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Defects such as naming the wrong court, using an incorrect party name, or omitting the required time to appear render the summons facially invalid.
Supporting sources
No. The summons must independently satisfy the content requirements even when the complaint supplies the missing information.
Supporting sources
Insufficiency of process concerns defects in the form or content of the summons itself while insufficient service of process concerns defects in the manner or method of delivery.
Supporting sources
The defense must be asserted in the first pre-answer motion or in the answer. Omission from an earlier motion waives it.
Supporting sources