Also known as:Indian tribes · Native American tribe · federally recognized tribe
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A group, band, nation, or other organized group of indigenous American people, including any Alaskan native village, that is recognized as eligible for special federal programs and services because of Indian status. The group must possess a governing body that exercises substantial governmental duties and powers over an area.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Commerce Clause Regulation
Congress enacts a statute imposing uniform licensing requirements on all entities selling goods across state lines to Indian tribes. Imperial Motors, a manufacturer located in one state, ships vehicles directly onto reservation land of the Red River Tribe for resale. Federal regulators enforce the statute against Imperial Motors under the power to regulate commerce with Indian tribes.
Grand Jury Assistance
A federal prosecutor investigating pharmaceutical diversion invites Redbird, an official from a tribal health clinic, to attend grand jury sessions. Redbird explains prescription patterns from tribal clinic records to help interpret evidence against Apex Pharma. The prosecutor later notifies the court of Redbird's identity and certifies that secrecy obligations were explained.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Restatements
Dictionaries
Sovereign Immunity Dispute
The Red River Tribe sues the State of Danton in federal court to recover unpaid revenue-sharing amounts under a federally approved casino compact. Danton moves to dismiss on Eleventh Amendment grounds. The court grants the motion after confirming that the tribe meets the federal-recognition criteria for bringing suit.
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida517 U.S. 44, 106 (1996)
Commerce Power Limits
Congress passes a statute criminalizing possession of certain items on lands within Indian tribes as part of a broader regulatory scheme. A defendant arrested on reservation land of the Red River Tribe challenges the statute as exceeding federal authority. The court upholds the law after verifying that the Red River Tribe is a federally recognized Indian tribe.
United States v. Lopez514 U.S. 549 (1995)
Tribal Land Escheat
An Indian tribe adopts a land consolidation program under federal authorization to prevent further fractionation of trust lands. Heirs of a deceased tribal member challenge an escheat provision that transfers small fractional interests to the Red River Tribe without compensation. The court examines whether the provision effects an unconstitutional taking after confirming tribal recognition status.
Hodel v. Irving481 U.S. 704 (1987)
Commerce Clause Challenge
A federal statute creates a civil remedy for gender-motivated violence occurring on Indian tribal lands. A defendant moves to dismiss a suit arising from an incident on reservation property of the Red River Tribe, arguing the provision exceeds Congress's authority. The court evaluates the challenge after verifying that the Red River Tribe qualifies as a federally recognized Indian tribe.
United States v. Morrison529 U.S. 598 (2000)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
How does the Constitution treat Indian tribes for purposes of federal legislative power?+
Article I, Section 8 grants Congress the power to regulate commerce with Indian tribes as a distinct category separate from foreign nations and the states. This clause supplies authority for federal statutes addressing tribal commercial activities and related matters.
When may federal prosecutors disclose grand jury matters to tribal personnel?+
An attorney for the government may disclose grand jury matters to personnel of an Indian tribe when the attorney considers them necessary to assist in enforcing federal criminal law. The recipients must be advised of secrecy obligations and may use the information only for that assistance purpose.
Does the Eleventh Amendment bar suits by Indian tribes against states in federal court?+
Yes, unless the state waives immunity or Congress validly abrogates it. Article I powers, including the Indian commerce clause, do not permit Congress to abrogate state sovereign immunity, so statutes resting solely on that power cannot authorize tribal suits against nonconsenting states.
514 U.S. 549 (1995)Constitutional Law
…delegates to Congress the power “[t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.” U. S. Const., Art. I, § 8, cl. 3. The Court, through Chief Justice Marshall, first defined the nature of that power in Gibbons v. Ogden , 9 Wheat. 1 (1824): “Commerce, undoubtedly, is…