Also known as:Indian-commerce power · Indian Commerce Clause
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
The constitutional authority granted to Congress to regulate commerce with Indian tribes. This power forms part of the broader Article I commerce authority and has historically been understood to support extensive federal oversight of relations with Native nations.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Tribe Sues State Over Compact Payments
The Red River Tribe sued the State of Danton in federal district court to recover unpaid amounts due under a revenue-sharing compact required by a federal statute enacted pursuant to the Indian commerce power. Danton moved to dismiss, asserting Eleventh Amendment immunity. The court granted the motion because the statute rested solely on Article I authority and could not validly abrogate the state's sovereign immunity.
State Tax Challenged on Reservation
Island Manufacturing, a non-Indian logging company operating on the White Mountain Apache Reservation under a tribal permit, challenged Arizona's motor fuel and use taxes as applied to its reservation activities. The tribe intervened to support the challenge. The Court examined whether the state taxes were preempted by federal law governing Indian commerce and tribal sovereignty.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Study Supplements
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker448 U.S. 136 (1980)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
Can Congress use the Indian commerce power to allow tribes to sue states in federal court for damages?+
No. The Indian commerce power is an Article I authority that does not permit Congress to abrogate a state's Eleventh Amendment immunity. Valid abrogation requires reliance on the enforcement power of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Supporting sources
What must Congress do to validly abrogate state sovereign immunity when legislating on Indian commerce matters?+
Congress must both clearly express its intent to abrogate immunity and act under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. Legislation resting only on the Indian commerce power fails the second requirement.
Supporting sources
Does entering a federally regulated tribal-state compact waive a state's Eleventh Amendment immunity?+
No. Waiver must be clear and unmistakable. Participation in a compact required by an Indian commerce statute does not by itself constitute consent to suit in federal court.
Supporting sources
517 U.S. 44, 106 (1996)Constitutional Law
…1, 14 (plurality opinion). Pp. 47–49. (b) Congress did not have the power to abrogate the States’ sovereign immunity under the Indian Commerce Clause, U. S. Const., Art. I, § 8, cl. 3. The Eleventh Amendment restricts the judicial power under Article III, and Article I cannot be used to circumvent the constitutional limitations placed…