Also known as:implied licences by conduct · implied license
Written by attorneys — see sources below.
A revocable permission inferred from a property owner's conduct or surrounding circumstances that allows another to enter land or perform an act that would otherwise be unlawful. The scope of the permission is measured by the conduct a typical visitor would undertake for ordinary social or business purposes.
See Our Sources
How its tested
Common Examples
2
Drug Dog on Attached Carport
A patrol officer suspected Marco stored fentanyl in a toolbox inside the roofed carport attached to his home. The officer walked a trained narcotics dog up the driveway and into the carport, where the dog alerted at the toolbox and kitchen door. Marco moved to suppress the resulting evidence. The conduct exceeded any implied license because ordinary visitors do not bring detection dogs into attached structures to investigate for contraband.
Foreign Book Resale Dispute
John Wiley & Sons discovered that Kirtsaeng had imported and resold textbooks manufactured abroad for the U.S. market. Wiley argued the sales infringed its distribution right. Kirtsaeng contended that Wiley's initial foreign sales and subsequent conduct created an implied license permitting resale in the United States. The court examined whether the copyright owner's actions manifested permission for the challenged distribution.
Kirtsaeng d/b/a Bluechristine99 v. John Wiley & Sons Inc.568 U.S. 519 (2013)
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., an academic textbook publisher, often assigns to its wholly owned foreign subsidiary Wiley Asia rights to publish, print, and sell foreign editions of Wiley's English language textbooks abroad. Each copy states that it is authorized for sale only in particular regions outside the United States and may not be exported without permission.
Supap Kirtsaeng, a citizen of Thailand, moved to the United States in 1997 to study mathematics at Cornell University on a Thai government scholarship. While studying, Kirtsaeng asked friends and family in Thailand to purchase copies of these foreign edition textbooks at low prices in Thai book shops and to mail them to him.
Kirtsaeng sold the imported books in the United States, reimbursed his family and friends for their purchases, and retained the profit after successfully completing his undergraduate and doctoral programs. In 2008 Wiley filed a federal lawsuit against Kirtsaeng alleging that his unauthorized importation and resale of the books infringed Wiley's exclusive right to distribute copies under 17 U.S.C. §106(3) and the import prohibition in §602(a)(1).
The District Court rejected Kirtsaeng's assertion of the first sale defense. The jury found that Kirtsaeng had willfully infringed eight of Wiley's copyrighted titles and assessed statutory damages of $600,000. A split panel of the Second Circuit affirmed the District Court's judgment that the first sale doctrine does not apply to copies of American copyrighted works manufactured abroad. The Supreme Court granted Kirtsaeng's petition for certiorari to consider the question in light of differing views among the Circuits.
Does an implied license allow officers to bring a drug-sniffing dog onto a home's front porch?
No. The implied license permits only the limited conduct of a typical visitor approaching to knock and speak briefly. Bringing a trained detection dog onto the porch for investigative purposes exceeds that license and constitutes a search of the curtilage.
Supporting sources
What facts determine whether a side yard or garden remains within the implied license?
Courts examine objective indicia such as fencing, personal items, proximity to the home, and whether the area appears reserved for private use. A maintained path alone does not extend the license when taller hedges and secluded features signal that the space is not open to exploratory investigation by visitors.
Supporting sources
Does an unlocked gate or maintenance access eliminate Fourth Amendment protection under the implied-license doctrine?
No. Routine access by service workers may create a limited implied license for those specific purposes, but it does not authorize officers to bring a drug dog into the same area for evidence gathering. The license is defined by ordinary social norms, not by the investigative goals of law enforcement.
Supporting sources
52 N.E.3d 1041 (Mass. 2016)
…viability of this option proposed by the Commonwealth is hampered for the additional reason that the defendant had no driver's license or any other apparent method to make the twenty-mile trek to Pittsfield. : As of 2014, Massachusetts had the fifth highest number of homeless people in the United States. 2014…
Criminal Law Constitutional ProtectionsConstitutional protections of accused persons · Arrest, search, and seizure [Fourth Amendment]NEXTGENFoundational