implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing
/im-PLIED kon-TRAK-choo-ul KUV-uh-nuhnt uv GOOD FAYTH and FAIR DEEL-ing/·doctrine
Also known as:implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing · covenant of good faith and fair dealing · good faith and fair dealing covenant · good faith covenant · implied good faith covenant · duty of good faith and fair dealing
Written by attorneys — see sources below.
A duty imposed by law upon each party to a contract requiring honest performance and enforcement that does not destroy or injure the other party's right to receive the fruits of the agreement.
See Our Sources
How its tested
Common Examples
4
Landlord Disrupts Tenant Access
Innovate Pharmaceuticals leased retail space from Insight Consulting under a percentage-rent lease. Insight closed entrances and conducted disruptive renovations for months to attract a replacement tenant. Innovate's sales fell sharply, prompting a breach suit that succeeded because Insight's management choices frustrated the lease's central purpose.
Insurer Delays Claim Payment
Ines Ibarra purchased disability coverage from Iris Energy's affiliate. After filing a claim, the insurer demanded duplicate records and unnecessary exams while pushing a low settlement. Ibarra prevailed on a breach claim because the repeated obstacles prevented her from obtaining the policy's promised protection.
Isaiah Ishikawa's startup obtained a revolving credit line from Icarus Aviation. After a late compliance filing, the lender refused further draws yet continued collecting fees. Ishikawa recovered damages because the lender's enforcement tactics deprived him of the financing benefit the agreement was meant to provide.
Employer Terminates to Avoid Commissions
Irene Ingalls sold software under an at-will employment contract that entitled her to commissions on closed deals. Her employer fired her days before a large commission vested. Ingalls recovered the lost commission because the termination was used solely to deprive her of the contract's expected benefit.
Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.47 Cal. 3d 654, 254 Cal. Rptr. 211, 765 P.2d 373
Interactive Data Corporation hired John Foley in June 1976 as an assistant product manager at a starting salary of $18,500. As a condition of employment Foley signed a confidential and proprietary information agreement. The company's president told Foley that if he performed his job well he would have a long and rewarding employment with the firm.
Over the next six years and nine months Foley received steady salary increases, promotions, bonuses, awards, and superior performance evaluations, rising to branch manager of the Los Angeles office with an annual salary of $56,164 plus a merit bonus. In January 1983 Foley learned that his new supervisor, Robert Kuhne, was under investigation by the FBI for embezzlement from his former employer, Bank of America. Foley reported the information to Vice President Richard Earnest because he was worried about working for Kuhne in a supervisory position.
Earnest told Foley not to discuss rumors and to forget what he had heard. In early March 1983 Kuhne informed Foley that the company had decided to replace him for performance reasons and offered a transfer to another division. Foley was later told he could continue as branch manager if he agreed to a performance plan, but when Kuhne met with him the next day Kuhne instead gave Foley the choice of resigning or being fired. Foley was discharged on March 13, 1983.
Foley filed suit against Interactive Data Corporation alleging three causes of action: tortious discharge in violation of public policy, breach of an implied-in-fact contract to terminate only for good cause, and tortious breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The superior court sustained the company's demurrer without leave to amend and dismissed the action. The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment. The Supreme Court granted review.
Does the implied covenant apply only during contract formation?
No. The duty governs performance and enforcement after the contract is formed. Conduct that occurs after signing can still breach the covenant when it frustrates the other party's expected benefits.
Supporting sources
Can a party breach the covenant by exercising an express contractual right?
Yes. Even when a contract grants discretion, such as a termination clause or rejection right, the party must exercise that right honestly and not as a pretext to deprive the other side of the bargain's fruits.
Supporting sources
Does the covenant create new affirmative obligations not stated in the contract?
No. It does not add terms or require one party to maximize the other's profits. It only prohibits conduct that undermines the contract's central purpose or the reasonable expectations created by the agreement.
Supporting sources
What remedy follows a breach of the implied covenant?
The injured party may recover contract damages for the loss caused by the bad-faith performance or enforcement. Punitive damages are unavailable unless the conduct also constitutes an independent tort.
…1, 9 (2003). Despite the existence of significant jurisprudence with respect to goodfaith in the contractual context of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, see, e.g., Desert Equities, Inc. v. Morgan Stanley Leveraged Equity Fund, II, L.P. , 624 A.2d 1199 (Del.1993), Delaware decisions have shown a reluctance to importing these contractual…