Also known as:impeach for bias · impeached for bias · impeaching for bias · bias impeachment
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A method of attacking a witness's credibility by showing that the witness has a motive to lie or slant testimony in favor of one party. The motive may arise from personal relationships, financial interests, hostility, or organizational ties. Proof of bias is always relevant and may be shown through cross-examination or extrinsic evidence.
Sources & Authorities· 1 primary source
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Casebooks
Course Outlines
How it applies
Common Examples
2
Probation Status Cross-Examination
Iain Irons stands trial for theft. The prosecution's key eyewitness, a fifteen-year-old seasonal worker, testifies that he saw Irons loading equipment into a truck. Defense counsel seeks to cross-examine the witness about a recent juvenile adjudication for livestock theft and the fact that his probation officer recommended him for the job at the farm. The inquiry reveals the witness's incentive to please authorities by implicating Irons, allowing the jury to assess whether that motive colored the testimony.
Organizational Membership Inquiry
Imperial Motors sues a former employee for breach of a noncompete agreement. The employee calls a longshoreman to testify that the disputed shipments were handled according to standard practice. On cross-examination, Imperial Motors asks the longshoreman whether he belongs to a group whose rules require members to give favorable accounts shielding the company from liability claims. The questions expose the witness's institutional incentive to slant testimony in the company's favor.
United States v. Abel469 U.S. 45 (1984)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
4
How does impeachment for bias differ from using religious beliefs to attack credibility?+
Evidence of religious beliefs or opinions is never admissible to attack or support a witness's credibility. In contrast, impeachment for bias remains available when the evidence shows a concrete motive arising from organizational membership or conduct, even if the underlying tenets have a religious component, provided the inquiry focuses on the resulting partiality rather than the beliefs themselves.
When may settlement communications be admitted to show bias?+
Settlement communications are generally inadmissible to prove or disprove the validity or amount of a disputed claim. They may nevertheless be admitted when offered for the distinct purpose of proving a witness's bias or prejudice, because the rule expressly preserves that use.
Courts permit proof of bias by extrinsic evidence when the evidence is relevant to show a witness's motive to favor one side. The Federal Rules contain no categorical bar on extrinsic proof of bias, although Rule 403 balancing still applies.
Does the Confrontation Clause require admission of juvenile records to show bias?+
In a criminal case the Confrontation Clause can require that a defendant be permitted to cross-examine a prosecution witness about the witness's juvenile record or probation status when the examination is necessary to expose bias. The constitutional right can override ordinary protections for juvenile confidentiality when the witness's credibility is central to the prosecution's case.
EvidencePresentation of evidence · Impeachment, contradiction, and rehabilitationUBEFoundational