Also known as: Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause · 14th Amendment Due Process Clause · Fourteenth Amendment due process · Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment · 14th Amendment Due Process
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
The constitutional command in the Fourteenth Amendment that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. It incorporates most Bill of Rights protections against the states and requires fair procedures before deprivations occur. Voluntariness of confessions and exclusion of illegally obtained evidence are enforced through this clause in state proceedings.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Faith Fitzgerald was charged in state court after officers searched her home without a warrant and seized documents. The trial court admitted the documents over her objection. On appeal the court reversed the conviction because the evidence had been obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Faye Fuller, a nineteen-year-old with limited education, was questioned for twelve hours without counsel or rest. She signed a confession after repeated accusations. The court excluded the statement after examining her age, condition, and the interrogation setting.
Flora Ford, a resident of a city that banned handguns in the home, sued after police seized her licensed pistol. She argued the ordinance violated her right to keep arms for self-defense. The court applied the incorporated Second Amendment to strike down the ban.
Floyd Franklin, a Delaware corporation president, received service while his company maintained sales representatives and contracts in Washington. The state sued for unpaid contributions. The court upheld jurisdiction because the company had purposefully availed itself of the forum.
Fatou Fall, a terminally ill patient, sought a physician's assistance to end her life under a state statute. The legislature had banned such aid. The court examined whether the claimed right was deeply rooted in history before rejecting the challenge.
Fernando Farrell received disability payments that the agency terminated after an internal review. He received only written notice and no pre-termination opportunity to present evidence. The court weighed his private interest, the risk of error, and the government's burden to decide what process was due.
The clause makes most Bill of Rights guarantees applicable to state and local governments when those rights are fundamental to ordered liberty. Courts examine whether a particular protection is deeply rooted in history and tradition before applying it to the states.
Supporting sources
Voluntariness is assessed under the totality of the circumstances, including the suspect's age, education, mental and physical condition, and the length and manner of interrogation. A confession obtained through physical coercion is automatically involuntary and inadmissible.
…of the mother, without regard to pregnancy stage and without recognition of the other interests involved, is violative of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (a) For the stage prior to approximately the end of the first trimester, the abortion decision and its effectuation must be left to the medical judgment of the pregnant woman's attending…
…v. Hogan , 378 U.S. 1 (1964), established that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is incorporated in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
…by the Fourteenth Amendment
…Justice Stone delivered the opinion of the Court. The questions for decision are (1) whether, within the limitations of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
…sequestration order on the ground that the sequestration statute was unconstitutional. They argued that the statute violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it permitted the Delaware courts to exercise jurisdiction over them without sufficient minimum contacts with the State. The Court of Chancery rejected the constitutional challenge…
Supporting sources
No. The clause requires notice and an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time, but the precise procedures depend on a balancing of the private interest, the risk of erroneous deprivation, and the government's interests. Pre-deprivation process is not always required when property can be dissipated or when post-deprivation remedies suffice.
Supporting sources
Evidence obtained by searches and seizures that violate the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in state criminal proceedings. The rule deters police misconduct and is an essential part of both the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Supporting sources