Also known as:forcible abductions · forcibly abduct · forcibly abducts · forcibly abducted · forcibly abducting · abduction by force
Written by attorneys — see sources below.
The act of seizing and carrying away a person by force sufficient to overcome resistance. At common law this element combined with transportation from the victim's own country into another country to constitute the misdemeanor of kidnapping.
See Our Sources
How its tested
Common Examples
2
Sedation and Border Transport
Felicity French directed two associates to administer a sedative to Flora Ford while she slept in her hotel room in Nation A. The associates loaded the unconscious Ford into a van and drove her across the international border into Nation B. Upon arrival Ford was confined in a guarded facility. The covert sedation overcame Ford's will and enabled the physical removal from one country into another.
Locked Vehicle and Unexpected Crossing
Forrest Falconer directed security personnel to place Felicia Fuentes into an off-road vehicle at a site in Nation A. The doors locked automatically and the vehicle crossed the border into Nation B without Fuentes's consent. Fuentes was then held at a remote camp for three days. The confinement in the locked vehicle during the border crossing satisfied the forcible carrying away requirement.
Frisbie v. Collins342 U.S. 519, rehearing denied, 343 U.S. 937 (1952)
Shirley Collins, serving a life sentence for murder in a Michigan state prison, brought this habeas corpus case in a United States District Court while acting as his own lawyer. His petition alleged that while living in Chicago, Michigan officers forcibly seized, handcuffed, blackjacked and took him to Michigan, and he claimed that trial and conviction under such circumstances violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Federal Kidnaping Act.
The District Court denied the writ without a hearing on the ground that the state court had power to try respondent regardless of how presence was procured. The Court of Appeals, one judge dissenting, reversed and remanded the cause for hearing, holding that the Federal Kidnaping Act had changed the prior rule that a state could constitutionally try and convict a defendant after acquiring jurisdiction by force.
To review this question the Supreme Court granted certiorari. Before the federal habeas proceedings, Collins had filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan which was denied on June 22, 1949. The state later contended that the District Court should have denied relief because respondent had an available state remedy, though the record shows no appearance of the state in the initial federal proceedings.
The Court of Appeals found the existence of special circumstances which required prompt federal intervention in this case. The trial court, pointing out that the Michigan Supreme Court had previously denied relief, apparently assumed that no further state corrective process was available and decided against respondent on the merits.
Does secret sedation without visible struggle satisfy the forcible element of common law kidnapping?
Yes. The common law definition requires forcible abduction sufficient to overcome the victim's will. Covert administration of a sedative that renders the victim unconscious and enables transport across an international border meets this standard even without outward resistance or outcry.
Supporting sources
Must the victim physically resist for the abduction to be forcible at common law?
No. Physical resistance is not required. Force or coercion sufficient to overcome the victim's will satisfies the forcible element.
Supporting sources
Does crossing a state line rather than an international border satisfy the common law kidnapping definition?
No. The common law offense requires transportation from the victim's own country into another country. Movement between states within the same country fails this element even if force is used.
Supporting sources
Is an intent to obtain ransom required for common law kidnapping?
No. The traditional common law definition turned solely on forcible abduction and international transportation. Motive such as ransom or silencing a whistleblower is irrelevant to liability.
Supporting sources
443 U.S. 545 (1979)
…conviction." Gerstein v. Pugh , 420 U. S. 103, 119. In Frisbie v. Collins , 342 U. S. 519, for example, a defendant had been forcibly abducted from one State and brought to another to stand trial, but the trial itself was fair, and the Court upheld his conviction. See also Mahon v. Justice , 127 U. S. 700; Ker v. Illinois , 119…
Criminal Law & ProcedureOther crimes · KidnappingUBEFoundational