Also known as:federal regulatory programs · federal program · regulatory program
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A scheme of federal rules, standards, and enforcement mechanisms designed to regulate conduct in a particular area of national concern. The scheme typically includes directives, licensing requirements, or data-collection obligations that federal authorities seek to implement through state officials or resources.
Sources & Authorities
How it applies
Common Examples
6
State Officers Refuse Background Checks
Faith Fitzgerald, a licensed firearms dealer in State A, submits a purchase application that requires a federal background check. State police officers decline to perform the check because federal law directs them to use state personnel and budgets to administer the program. The dealer sues, arguing that the federal directive improperly conscripts state resources.
State Must Enact Waste Disposal Rules
Fernando Farrell operates a low-level radioactive waste facility in State B. Federal legislation requires the state legislature to enact a disposal plan or take title to all waste generated within its borders. Farrell challenges the statute after the state refuses to comply, claiming the federal mandate commandeers state legislative processes.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Casebooks
New York v. United States505 U.S. 144, 168 (1992)
EPA Issues Generation Shifting Rule
Flagship Logistics burns coal at several power plants. The EPA adopts a rule requiring states to reduce emissions by shifting generation to cleaner sources or face federal penalties. State environmental officials must develop and enforce compliance plans using state staff and budgets under the federal program.
West Virginia v. EPA597 U.S. ___, 142 S. Ct. 2587 (2022)
Taxpayer Challenges Federal Spending
Francois Fortier pays federal income taxes and objects to expenditures under a federal education grant program. He files suit alleging that the program exceeds congressional authority because it funds activities outside the enumerated powers. The complaint focuses on whether the regulatory scheme is a valid exercise of federal power.
Flast v. Cohen392 U.S. 83, 95 (1968)
Contractor Challenges Set-Aside Program
Falcon Dynamics bids on a federal highway project but loses the subcontract to a firm certified under a federal regulatory program that presumes social and economic disadvantage based on race. The company sues, contending that the certification criteria in the federal program violate equal protection.
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena515 U.S. 200, 115 S.Ct. 2097, 132 L.Ed.2d 158 (Sup.Ct.1995)
State Accepts Highway Funds with Conditions
Fatima Flores drives on State C highways after the state raises its drinking age to retain federal highway construction funds. The state legislature enacts the age requirement solely to comply with conditions attached to the federal regulatory program. A motorist challenges the state law as an invalid exercise of federal spending power.
South Dakota v. Dole483 U.S. 203 (1987)
Common questions
Frequently Asked
3
What distinguishes a permissible federal regulatory program from an unconstitutional commandeering of state officials?+
A federal regulatory program is permissible when Congress regulates private parties directly or offers states a genuine choice through conditional spending. It becomes unconstitutional commandeering when federal law requires state officers to administer or enforce the program using state personnel and budgets without consent.
Supporting sources
Can Congress use conditional grants to induce states to participate in a federal regulatory program?+
Yes. Congress may attach unambiguous conditions to federal funds that are reasonably related to the purpose of the expenditure and do not violate independent constitutional prohibitions, leaving states free to decline the funds.
Supporting sources
Does the anti-commandeering doctrine apply to both state legislatures and state executive officers?+
Yes. Federal law may not direct state legislatures to enact specific rules or command state executive officers to perform federal enforcement tasks as part of a regulatory program.
Supporting sources
505 U.S. 144 (1992)Bankruptcy Law
…does not permit Congress to commandeer the States' legislative processes by directly compelling them to enact and enforce a federal regulatory program; Congress must legislate directly upon individuals when it wishes to regulate. Nevertheless, Congress may encourage state compliance by permissible methods short of coercion. Under its…