Also known as:fairly · fairness · fair trial · fair hearing · fair use
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A standard of impartiality and equity applied to legal procedures, transactions, and conduct. It requires that parties receive balanced treatment and that relevant information or considerations not be omitted in a manner that distorts outcomes.
Sources & Authorities· 37 primary sources
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Cases
Statutes
Federal Rules
Uniform Acts
Model Codes
Restatements
How it applies
Common Examples
6
Deposition Completeness Dispute
During trial, Fiona Foster introduced only the portions of Floyd Franklin's deposition that supported her contract claim. Franklin's counsel immediately requested that the remaining pages describing the parties' course of dealing also be read to the jury. The court granted the request, ensuring the record reflected the full context of the testimony.
Judge's Public Remarks
Judge Francesca Fiore commented publicly on a pending criminal case, stating that the evidence appeared overwhelming. Defense counsel moved to disqualify her, arguing the statements could influence the jury pool and undermine impartial adjudication. The motion succeeded because the remarks risked affecting the proceeding's outcome.
Lawyer-Client Business Deal
Attorney Faye Fuller proposed purchasing a client's undeveloped land for development. She sent a detailed letter setting out the purchase price, financing terms, and her dual role, then gave the client two weeks to consult separate counsel. The client signed a written consent after independent review, satisfying the fairness requirement for the transaction.
Agent Self-Dealing Disclosure
Real-estate agent Felicia Fuentes listed her principal's commercial building while simultaneously negotiating to buy it for her own LLC. She disclosed the conflict and all known valuation data to the principal before closing. The principal approved the sale after reviewing the information, satisfying the agent's duty of fair dealing.
Contract Modification Review
Fusion Power and Falcon Dynamics agreed to increase the contract price after unforeseen steel tariffs raised costs. The parties documented the change with new pricing that reflected only the tariff impact and preserved the original profit margin. A court later upheld the modification as fair and equitable under the unanticipated circumstances.
Stream-of-Commerce Jurisdiction
A foreign manufacturer sold components to a U.S. assembler knowing some products might reach the forum state. When an indemnity suit arose, the manufacturer moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court granted the motion, finding that mere awareness of possible forum contacts did not satisfy the requirements of fair play and substantial justice.
Common questions
Frequently Asked
5
When must an adverse party be allowed to introduce additional deposition testimony?+
An adverse party may require introduction of other deposition parts that fairness requires be considered together with the portions already offered. Any party may also introduce additional parts on its own initiative. This rule prevents selective presentation that distorts the record.
Supporting sources
What public statements by a judge violate fairness standards?+
A judge may not make public statements reasonably expected to affect the outcome or impair the fairness of a pending or impending matter. Nonpublic statements that substantially interfere with a fair trial are likewise prohibited. The rule protects the integrity of judicial proceedings.
What must a lawyer disclose when entering a business transaction with a client?+
The transaction terms must be fair and reasonable to the client. Full written disclosure is required in language the client can understand. The client must also receive written advice about seeking independent counsel and must give informed written consent.
Supporting sources
What duty does an agent owe when dealing on its own account with the principal's knowledge?+
The agent must deal fairly with the principal and disclose all facts the agent knows or should know would reasonably affect the principal's judgment. This obligation continues unless the principal has manifested knowledge of the facts or indifference to them.
Supporting sources
When is a contract modification binding under principles of fairness?+
A modification is binding if it is fair and equitable in light of circumstances not anticipated when the contract was formed. The rule applies only to contracts not fully performed on either side.
Supporting sources
and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole,” Armstrong v. United States , 364 U. S. 40, 49 (1960), this Court, quite simply, has been unable to develop any “set formula” for…
play that can be secured only by a pretty close adhesion to fact." McDonald v. Mabee , 243 U. S. 90, 91. We hold that the notice of judicial settlement of accounts required by the New…
Family LawSeparation, divorce, dissolution, and annulment · Division of propertyUBEFoundational