Also known as: durational residency requirements · durational residence requirement · durational residence requirements · residency requirement
Written by attorneys · grounded in primary & secondary sources — see below
A precondition to the exercise of a specified right or privilege that requires a person to have resided in the jurisdiction for a specified period of time. The requirement creates a temporary barrier for newcomers seeking benefits or access and is evaluated for constitutionality under the right to travel and equal protection principles when imposed by states.
Dorothy Daniels, a lawfully present resident alien who arrived three years ago, applies for full Medicare coverage. Federal regulations deny her benefits because she lacks five years of residence. The classification receives rational-basis review and is upheld as neither arbitrary nor unreasonable.
Dustin Donovan moves to a new state and immediately seeks cash assistance for which he meets all other eligibility criteria. The state denies the application solely because he has not resided there for one year. The denial violates the right to travel because protecting the treasury by deterring indigent migration is not a permissible objective.
Select any source to read its text and confirm it supports the definition.
Daniel Diaz relocates to Iowa and files for divorce after six months. Iowa law requires one year of residency before a court may grant the decree. The requirement is upheld because it merely imposes a temporary barrier to ensure genuine attachment to the state rather than foreclosing access permanently.
Diego Duarte moves into a congressional district and seeks to run for the House seat one month later. State law imposes a one-year durational residency requirement for candidates. The requirement is challenged as an impermissible addition to constitutional qualifications for federal office.
Delilah Duran applies for a state civil-service position but is ranked below male veterans despite higher exam scores. The preference statute once included a five-year residency condition that was later invalidated. The current rule is evaluated for whether any remaining durational element survives equal-protection review.
Destiny Davis, a noncitizen parent, seeks derivative citizenship for her child after three years of U.S. residence. Federal law conditions eligibility on longer physical presence. The requirement is reviewed under rational-basis standards because Congress holds plenary power over immigration classifications.
State durational residency requirements for benefits such as welfare normally trigger strict scrutiny because they penalize the exercise of the fundamental right to travel. The state must show the requirement is narrowly tailored to a compelling interest. Protecting the treasury by discouraging indigent migration is not a permissible objective.
Supporting sources
Federal classifications based on alienage receive only rational-basis review because Congress possesses plenary power over immigration. A five-year residency requirement for benefits is upheld if it is not arbitrary or unreasonable.
Supporting sources
The requirement was upheld because it created only a temporary barrier rather than an irretrievable foreclosure of the right to divorce. The state interest in ensuring genuine attachment to the forum justified the waiting period under the circumstances presented.
Supporting sources
A durational residency requirement for voting burdens the fundamental right to travel and the right to vote and is therefore subject to strict scrutiny. Congress has abolished such requirements for presidential elections, and the Court has struck down lengthy state waiting periods for state elections.
Supporting sources
…burden on the marriage decision. Id. , at 54. Similarly, in Sosna v. Iowa , 419 U.S. 393 (1975), the Court upheld a one-year residency requirement for obtaining a divorce. The Court held that the statute did not significantly interfere with the right to marry because it did not prohibit marriage; it merely regulated the conditions…